Showing posts with label democracy in action. Show all posts
Showing posts with label democracy in action. Show all posts

Indian Election Gives Congress Party "Massive Mandate"

The big national election in India gave more power to the powers already in power. Surprising most observers, the Congress Party swept the polls in a huge victory. 

It marks a huge loss for India's leftists, especially the Communist Party of India and the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M) general secretary Prakash Karat, who had come to see the election as a referendum on the Left's ideological stance as opposed to that of the Congress, acknowledged that the results were a "major setback" for them. He agreed that the people all over the country had voted "on the basis of the platform put forward" by the Congress and its allies. Full Story at EconomicTimes.indiatimes.com...

The Economic Times also reports that Congress President Sonia Gandhi says that Manmohan Singh will be the Prime Minister. Singh would be the first person since Jawaharlal Nehru to "return to power after a full five-year term." The ruling Congress party swept to a resounding victory Saturday in India's mammoth national elections, defying expectations as it brushed aside the Hindu nationalist opposition and a legion of ambitious smaller parties. The strong showing by the party, which is dominated by the powerful Nehru-Gandhi political dynasty, laid to rest fears of an unstable, shaky coalition heading the South Asian giant at a time when many of it neighbors are plagued by instability, civil war and rising extremism. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh declared victory, telling reporters that voters had given the Congress party-led coalition a "massive mandate." Full Report from AP/Yahoo! News...

"We have won a thumping majority," Congress activist Parag Jain said outside the party offices, in a leafy, elegant south New Delhi neighborhood. "Successful rule begins and ends with Congress and the Gandhi family."

RELATED: India's Left Loses in Strongholds - Wall Street Journal Parliament to host four Gandhis for the first time - The Economic Times Left will have no role in government formation - Economic Times Left has suffered 'major setback', admits Karat - Hindustan Times Left allies dig in heels against Cong, BJP - Expressindia.com Maoist Revolutionary parties and organizations in India - massline.info Incidents involving Communist Party of India... - South Asia Terrorism Portal

Iraq More Democratic Than China Today

On Saturday, January 31, millions of people in Iraq enthusiastically turned out to excercise their still-new democratic freedom to vote for the candidates of their choice. No longer living in a dictatorship, the people of Iraq are determined to never lose their democracy. (A quick note of thanks to President Bush and all of the men and women of the US Armed Forces.) "Many people have seen Iraq as a dictatorship, but today that has changed," he said, casting his ballot in Baghdad. "Others are saying this is a sectarian government, but this isn't true. We can't be a dictatorship again and we won't be." Full Story at The Observer... Even Al Jazeera has a happy report on video (linked here and embedded below). Meanwhile, in China, democracy is faring less well than in Iraq. As another report from Al Jazeera shows (link here), nothing much has really changed since the butchery in Tianenman Square. How ironic that so many Americans are pissed off about "imposing" democracy on Iraq, but so gladly rush to do business with China's dictatorial leaders (creators of the most Orwellian Olympics since Adolf Hitler hosted them in Berlin), the iron-fisted suppressors of free speech and thought. CNB RSS Feed

Chicago Citywide Mock Election Needs YOU

The League of Women Voters will spearhead the largest mock election in the nation. It's a big project that will involve every Chicago public high school. Although they are working with Mikva Challenge and other civic participation groups, they still need volunteers to reach every student. People who have the time to volunteer are welcome. See the press release below for contact information. Citywide Mock Election Project Needs Volunteers The presidential election is a great opportunity to tap student interest and teach young people the value of being voting members of their community. From September 30th through October 3rd 2008, Chicago public high school students will participate in the largest Mock Election in the country. The Chicago Mock Election program is a key part of Illinois Student Vote, an initiative of the League of Women Voters of Illinois, the Chicago Public Schools and the Chicago Board of Elections. Volunteers are needed to serve as Mock Election Officials and to register 18-year-olds to vote. The commitment requires a short training session (60 minutes) in September and working from 9:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. in a Chicago public high school on the day(s) of your choice. This is a non-partisan event and volunteer opportunity. Neither candidates nor political parties are being promoted; process and participation is. What is asked of a Mock Election Official? • Attend one 60 minute training session prior to the Mock Election • Volunteer at a participating high school on September 30, October 1, 2 or 3 • Be present at the school from 9:30am until 2:30pm What does a Mock Election Official do? • Engage students about the importance of voting and why you volunteered • Guide students through the Mock Election process • Verify eligibility of student voters and register 18-year-olds to vote • Oversee hand-counting of the ballots and report the results to http://www.illinoisstudentvote.org/ • Take pictures, if possible, and share your experience with Illinois Student Vote Please volunteer to be a Mock Election Official. We need your help to ensure full participation at each and every public high school in Chicago. Contact the Illinois Student Vote Coordinator: Bob Fuller bfuller@lwvil.org 312-939-5935 x39

Nepal Steps Toward Suicide

Maoism: the theory and practice of Marxism-Leninism developed in China chiefly by Mao Zedong [source] Kathmandu, Aug 15: With the election of Maoist supremo Prachanda, once hunted by Interpol with a bounty on his head, as Nepal's first Prime Minister in the post-monarchy era, a question mark hangs on what course the Himalayan country will take, including on its ties with India. FULL STORY... What the definition above does not tell you is that Maoists, unlike your average socialist on the street, are very violent and believe strongly in using violence to achieve their political goals. Kinda like Barack Obama's buddy William Ayers. No, that's not an exagerration. Ayers and fellow Weatherman alumni believed in firebombing and arson as valid political tools. They quoted Mao extensively. Still do, really. Back to Nepal, which has just taken it's first decisive step toward suicide by electing Maoists to run their beautiful country. Poor naifs. What the Maoists called their "people's war" had left 13,000 people dead, tens of thousands displaced and much of the country's infrastructure destroyed. [BBC] Many news reports today speculate whether Prachanda will act democratically, drop his nom de guerre, etc. Hmmm. Many news reports today involve the "former" Soviet Union acting a lot like, well, the Soviet Union. Look, kids, with very rare exception, once an avowed Communist, always an avowed Communist, whether you're Bill Ayers or Prachanda. RELATED: VOA News - Nepal Selects Maoist Leader as Prime Minister Nepal Terrorist Groups - Maoist Insurgents CHRONOLOGY - Milestones in Nepal's Maoist war, peace Maoist Internationalist Movement (MIM) BBC NEWS - Who are Nepal's Maoist rebels?

IMPEACHING MUSHARRAF; TROUBLE AHEAD FOR PAKISTAN

THIS COULD LEAD TO CIVIL WAR IN PAKISTAN. President Musharraf of Pakistan is being impeached - and he vows to resist. Meanwhile, the US is considering increased military operations in Pakistan. ISLAMABAD: After three days of intense talks, the PPP-led ruling coalition in Pakistan announced on Thursday that it had decided to impeach President Pervez Musharraf, warning that any move by him to fight back by dissolving Parliament would be rejected by the nation. Will the crap hit the fan? MAYBE: Indications from the presidency are that Gen. Musharraf may fight back. He has powers to dissolve parliament, but [he was] warned against the use of that weapon. FULL STORY at The Hindu Newspaper... MORE: Pakistan army to ask Pervez Musharraf to resign Musharraf impeachment move a first for Pakistan Musharraf stands firm against impeachment No surrender: Musharraf in appeal to army

Illinois Deserves Better

Get this book and read it! Illinois Deserves Better: The Ironclad Case FOR an Illinois Constitutional Covention, by John C. A. Bambenek & Bruno Behrend

An Illinois Constitutional Convention?

Should There Be A Constitutional Convention? (Thanks to Al Salvi and Bruno Behrend for this information) Few Illinois citizens are aware that the most important vote they can cast this coming November is whether or not Illinois will hold a Constitutional Convention. This is a once in a 20-year opportunity for Illinois citizens to amend, or completely rewrite, the ground rules between citizens and their government. HowWill a ConventionWork? If 60% of the people vote “yes” on the question of whether to have a convention, the next session of the legislature will provide for the election of 2 delegates from each Senate District, (118) along with the funding and the location of the Convention. Once convened, any changes approved by delegates are then presented to the voters for ratification. The changes will be ratified if approved by a simple majority. ALSO SEE: Should Illinois hold 'Con-Con' in 2010? (News-Star, July 2). Date: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 Time: 5:30 pm - Doors Open 6:00 pm - 8:00 pm - Program Place: Austin’s Saloon & Eatery 481 Peterson Road Libertyville, Illinois 60048 www.austinssaloon.com Cash Bar - Free Pizza After Debate Format: Debate followed by Q&A (open mike) Live Call-In 6-8 pm • 847-336-1220 Simulcast Live -WKRS 1220 A Meet & Greet and Straw Poll will be held after the Debate.

Edgewater Landmarking Defeated

An effort to impose landmark status on 15 buildings in Chicago's Edgewater neighborhood was voted down by community members on Wednesday, May 28. The meeting was hosted by 48th Ward Alderman Mary Ann Smith at her office on N. Broadway.

The attempt to landmark the buildings, most of which are houses, met vehement resistance from community members. Passionate speeches were made by both supporters and opponents of the proposal. Voting was restricted to delegates from block clubs and community organizations. The final vote: 20 votes "No," 8 votes "Yes" and 7 abstentions.

SEE UPDATED FULL REPORT

The Autocrats of Springfield

Oh, those "Democrats." So un-democratic. Not only are they fond of disenfranchising their own party voters in primary after primary nationwide, they use autocratic strongarm tactics in the Illinois Legislature: Rep. Keith Sommer, R-Morton, said he didn't think much of the process that House Democrats used Wednesday to pass the budget plans, giving lawmakers - especially Republicans - little chance to review them. "This resembles the government of Burma," said Sommer, referring to the country also known as Myanmar. "They know best what to do. They want no outside help. And yet they're tacking on billions and billions of dollars in costs to the taxpayers, with no way to pay for it." STORY AT PJSTAR... RELATED: FLORIDA DEMOCRATS SUING DEMOCRAT NATIONAL COMMITTEE, SAY THEY ARE "DISENFRANCHISED"

MOORE MAKES FOOL OF SELF ON RADIO

Alderman Joe Moore put another nail in the coffin of his political career this morning. (Are you paying attention, Howard Dean?)

Speaking live by phone on WLS 890 AM this morning with morning hosts Don Wade and Roma about the humiliating defeat of his two-year old foie gras ban, Moore said that the Chicago City Council has "lost even the pretense of a democracy." Hear the full interview (6.6 mb mp3 file.)

The 49th Ward Alderman complained that Mayor Daley did not turn on his microphone in yesterday's council meeting, thereby shutting him down. "How did the Mayor cut off your microphone?" Wade asked Moore.

Moore said that a technician only turns on Council members' microphones when they are called on by the Mayor. Moore's microphone never went on, he said, "because the Mayor never recognized me."

He also complained that Daley did not follow parliamentary procedure. Moore then went off on a tangent, starting to tell Don and Roma about his resolution that calls for the United States to "never invade Iran."

"Excuse me," said Wade, "what is the City Council of Chicago doing, voting on whether or not the United States of America is going to invade another country?"

"Well, I'll tell you exactly why," said Moore, and he then rattled off dollar figures related to the war effort in Iraq.

"Alderman, Alderman, stop," moaned Wade, exasperated, trying to interrupt. Moore kept babbling on. "Please," said Moore, "it isn't the purview of the City Council of Chicago to decide whether we invade another country."

Roma changed the subject suddenly. "So when are you going to run for Congress or for Senate?"

Moore danced around that question. "I think my Congressman's job is safe," he said, "and the U.S. Senators' jobs are safe as well." And then he veered right back into the antiwar resolution. "To suggest that we should embark on yet another war….is a folly."

And then a surprise came for the audience.

IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING MOORE'S PHONE INTERVIEW, 50th Ward Alderman Bernie Stone was interviewed.

Stone, on the phone, said Moore was a "cry baby" who doesn't know proper procedure for City Council meetings. Stone said that had Moore followed procedure, he could have spoken, but Daley called the vote without Moore doing what was required. But that's not all that Stone said.

Moore is a "tool of Hamas," Stone said.
He said the particular anti-war resolution that Moore was proposing would serve as a propaganda tool for Hamas, which is sworn to destroy Israel.

The end result of the exchange between Moore and Don Wade, then Stone and Don Wade, is that Joe Moore was painted as a boob who does not understand City Council procedures, is a cry baby who is whining about losing a battle, and he's a useful idiot for anti-American interests.

For Alderman Joe Moore to complain about a lack of democratic procedure in the City Council is the height of hypocrisy. Moore is notorious in his 49th Ward for closed zoning meetings, often ignoring the wishes of constituents, and for alleged voter fraud and allegedly shaking down local developers.

FLASHBACK: Mayor Daley Calls Alderman Moore Incompetent

You can hear the entire interview with Moore here (mp3 file, 6.6 mb).

JOE MOORE'S GOOSE LIVER HISSY FIT

"THE SILLIEST LAW EVER WRITTEN," is what Mayor Daley called Chicago's ban on foie gras (goose liver pate). Today, the Chicago City Council repealed the ineffective law by a vote of 37-6. The law, which banned restaurants from selling it, but could not prevent them from giving it away.

(Snarky question: Does this mean that Joe has to give Dana Kohl's $30K campaign contribution back?)

Stores could still sell it, it was not illegal to buy or eat it, only for restaurants to sell it. The anti-foie gras ordinance was the pride and joy of its author, Chicago's 49th Ward Aldergoose Joe Moore, who wrote it in 2006. By tossing it out, the Chicago City Council gains a bit more respect.

Get this: According to the Associated Press, "The measure passed Wednesday by a vote of 37-6 with no debate. Its sponsor, Alderman Joe Moore, shouted his objections." Can you imagine mild mannered gooseboy Joe Moore shouting his objections to the rest of the Voters should remember this kind of ineffective, time wasting stupidity when Joe Moore runs for Congress in 2009.

A personal note: Joe, who is "discredited" now? The mayor - and millions of others - call your foie gras ordinance "the silliest law ever written." In spite of your lunatic fringe supporters, most of us see it that way. And today that silly law was soundly defeated. YOU, Joe Moore, are now an officially discredited fool, a laughing stock, the butt of jokes. And the national and international press is eating it up.

If Obama becomes our next president this November, we will likely see a special election called to fill the vacated Congressional seat of Jan "The Man" Schakowsky, who would likely move up to fill Obama's vacated U.S. Senate seat. You can bet money that Joe Moore will be put up to run by the local Schakowsky-led Democrat Machine.

The Un-Democratic Party of Illinois

Yes, you, Illinois voters, are that much-feared "outside entity." So writes the Chicago Tribune today in a piece aptly titled "Contempt for voters." So be it, the Trib continues, All of us in the outside entity now need to ask every Democratic senator we encounter why he or she didn't do more to advance the recall amendment. If you make to-do lists, here are the 21 Democrats whose votes of no or present (the effect is the same) denied you a voice on that amendment: SEE THE LIST and the FULL ARTICLE at the Chicago Tribune... See, folks, this is why some of insist on calling it the "Democrat Party" rather than the "Democratic Party." They love to do undemocratic things. Superdelegates, denying Michigan and Florida voters the oppotunity to participate in primary elections, and stuff like this.

President Obama, Congressman Joe Moore, Alderman David Fagus

Are you ready for Congressman Joe Moore? Oh yes, my friends, if Barack Obama keeps this up, he may well win the Democrat nomination. Now, suppose Obama wins it all and becomes our Next President? I am not making this up. Honestly. Democracy in Rogers Park will take a step backward, as if that is possible! The Bench has sitting on this for while now, but only today had an epiphany thanks to a woman much wiser than I am. Here's the hypothetical skinny: U.S. Senator Obama becomes President, leaving his Senate seat vacant. Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky, wife of convicted felon Bobby Creamer, is appointed to fill that seat. She becomes U.S. Senator Schakowsky. (Her husband remains a crooked scum. Sorry, Bob, the promotion won't take that stain off of you.) With Schakowsky's seat in Congress vacant, 49th Ward Alderfart Joe Moore will be named to fill her seat, thus becoming Congressfart Joe Moore. Who will fill Joe's $400 Italian shoes once he's gone off to Washington? Why, none other than David Fagus, currently the evil 49th Ward Democrat Committeeman. That's right; he will become Alderman David Fagus. Sorry, Jim Ginderske, you probably won't get it. And your little dog Wee Wee won't be able to tag along, either. You both carry water well, but not well enough. So who will fill Fagus's vacated Committeeman position? Not now, I'll tell you early next week, boys and girls. And you thought the Democrat Party was "Democratic?" Ha ha ha ha ha hahahahahaha! Oh, man, that's funny!

Ray of Hope in Pakistan?

Will Democracy prove a potent antidote to radical Islamists in Pakistan? We certainly hope so. But before you get too optimistic, remember this: The voters are likely to respect the outcome of a fair election. The radical Islamists, on the other hand, won't really give a damn what the outcome of the vote is. PESHAWAR, Pakistan (Reuters) - Pakistani voters are expected to succeed where President Pervez Musharraf has failed, pushing back the Islamist tide and throwing out of power political clerics governing Pakistan's violent northwest. "God forbid, I will never vote for mullahs," said Saif-ur-Rehman, a bearded stall owner in Qissa Khawani, a famous bazaar in Peshawar, before rushing for prayers at a mosque in the provincial capital of North West Frontier Province (NWFP). FULL STORY at Reuters...

Ben Franklin Was A Blogger

Heather Steans is all too typical, and my recent posts about being ejected from the Heather Steans victory party on February 5 was not about me. It was not even about Heather Steans. (See Blogger Ejected From Bitter Victory Party and Steans Ejects Citizen Journalist From Victory Party.)

The story involved me, yes. It involved Steans and her gang, yes. However, the story is really about politicians and the bloggers they shun. The story of Heather Steans kicking a blogger out of her victory party is a story of small mindedness, pettiness, ignorance, and stupidity.

It is about a fear of the new media. It is, ultimately, about how many politicians fear the eyes and ears of the public. It is also about a basic misunderstanding about what blogs and bloggers are.

To explain this, it is necessary to first examine what a “blogger” is. To begin, let’s go to a few expert sources.

Blogger.com is one of the biggest hosting services for people who blog. They define a blog this way:

A blog gives you your own voice on the web. It's a place to collect and share things that you find interesting— whether it's your political commentary, a personal diary, or links to web sites you want to remember.

“Many people use a blog just to organize their own thoughts, while others command influential, worldwide audiences of thousands. Professional and amateur journalists use blogs to publish breaking news, while personal journalers reveal inner thoughts.”

If you didn’t know that this was a definition of a blog, you might think it was the definition of a newspaper or magazine. Perhaps, even, a radio show. Or Benjamin Franklin with his little upstart publication, “Poor Richard’s Almanac.” You know, “real” media.

Why would that scare a petty political hack such as Heather Steans? Let’s break it down into the elements that most frighten Steans and her ilk:

>>> “Political commentary” – God forbid you should say anything critical of a person running for an office in which he/she will be able to influence your life.

>>> Some blogs “command influential, worldwide audiences of thousands” – like this one. At 15,000+ readers per month, The Bench is comparable to many, many print magazines. Imagine a city of 15,000. Now imagine that you publish a monthly magazine there, and every single person in town reads your magazine. Nothing to sneeze at. The mayor would invite you to every party. So would every town council member.

>>> “Professional and amateur journalists use blogs.” Did you notice the word “professional” here?

>>> “Use blogs to publish breaking news.” Hmmm. Sounds like “real” media, doesn’t it?

Still, many people just don’t get it. They think that all bloggers are nothing more than rumor mongers and busy bodies. Sure, many are. But the same can be said of many in the respected “real” media world. But the “real” media, the Big Media, is smart enough to make good use of blogs. They are themselves, therefore, bloggers.

One example of many: The blogs of CBS News.

Ultimately a “blog” (short for “web log”) is just a web site. To compare it to the print media, saying “web site” is akin to saying “publication.” Neither is specific. For example, a paper “publication” can include a local newsletter, a high school newspaper, the New York Times, Playboy Magazine, or a political leaflet. Saying “web site” can include a straightforward local government site that gives information. It could include porn sites, sites about movie stars, or anything else that any kind of paper publication does.

Okay, a “blog” is a type of web site. But just as a “magazine” is a type of publication, it doesn’t tell us what kind of information it is presenting. “Blog” and “magazine” are still not very specific.

“News magazine” or “gardening magazine” are much more specific. Now you have a better idea of what is presented. Similarly, there are blogs about pets, about gardening, news, whatever.

The blog you’re reading right now (The Bench) presents a mix of items, just as many web sites do, and just as many big magazines do. Newsweek magazine, for example, also has light feature articles, some humor, and so on. The Chicago Tribune newspaper has a comics section. Get the idea?

Another good definition of a blog comes from problogger.net:

“Blogs are usually (but not always) written by one person and are updated pretty regularly. Blogs are often (but not always) written on a particular topic - there are blogs on virtually any topic you can think of. From photography, to spirituality, to recipes, to personal diaries to hobbies - blogging has as many applications and varieties as you can imagine. Whole blog communities have sprung up around some of these topics putting people into contact with each other in relationships where they can learn, share ideas, make friends with and even do business with people with similar interests from around the world.”

Read that again. Think about it. Again, the definition could easily be applied to print publications.

By now, you should be convinced that “blog” is a vanilla term. A “blogger,” quite simply, is a person who blogs. Bloggers are writers, and just as in the print world, there are good writers and not-so-good writers. Whether the writer/blogger is “good” or not is irrelevant. They are writing, doing the best they can. Some well-known, professional journalists are better than others. That’s why only a few win Pulitzers.

Back to Benjamin Franklin, mentioned at the top of this piece. Franklin would be a blogger if he lived today.

“In 1721 James decided to start a newspaper. At the time there were already two newspapers in Boston, but this newspaper, the New England Courant, was different. Instead of reporting on news from Europe, the Courant reported on local news with clever reporting and contributions from its readers.” (Source)

Sounds like a blog to me. To continue with that:

“After a couple of especially controversial stories in 1723, the Massachusetts legislature decided that the Courant had mocked religion and the government and should be punished. They put James in jail and passed an order that "James Franklin should no longer print the paper."

Again, sounds like a blog. Okay, I exaggerate just a bit. But the Heather Steans of the modern world would put us away if they could. They are petty enough to kick bloggers out of the events that “real” media persons are allowed into. In many places, such as Chicago, journalists must be “accredited” by the local officials to get real access to government information or police blotters.

If Steans can be so spiteful as to kick a blogger/writer out of her victory party because he wasn't there to celebrate her victory - in other words, to demonstrate favoritism toward her - she would not hesitate to shut down or even jail said blogger if it was within her power. This is frightening, because if she would treat a blogger/citizen journalist that way, how will she treat the constituents who are openly critical of her? How will Heather Steans, and politicians like her, behave toward members of the “real” media who are critical?

No, my postings about Heather Steans kicking me out of her party were not about me. They were about you, your right to participate, your right to openly criticize a politician or public official, and about the mean spiteful disdain that so many in government “service” have for us.

Ben Franklin must be rolling in his grave.

Steans Ejects Citizen Journalist From Victory Party

Part Two, continued from yesterday's "Blogger Ejected From Bitter Victory Party" I walked into the Heather Steans victory party at 10:05 p.m. The difference in tone between this, the winner's party, and that of the party of Suzanne Elder was stark. Elder lost to Steans, but as mentioned previously, Elder’s party was fun. Steans won but her party was down, somber, and bitterness pervaded the air. It occured to me later why there was so much bitterness. The room was aware of the late breaking news about the "magic pen" scandal (much more about that soon). The Machine's great white hope, Larry Suffredin, had just lost a big race. Jim Ginderske, hoping to be appointed to Suffredin's vacated seat had he won, had nowhere to go. I went straight to the bar and engaged in a friendly conversation with two men. One guy, "Robert," asked my name. Before I could respond the younger man next to him, who I have never seen before, said, "That's Tom Mannis." You’ve seen old Western movies where the hero rides into a small town where he is unknown. He gets off his horse and walks into the nearest saloon. He goes to the bar, and the sheriff comes in and gives him the fisheye. “You’re a stranger ‘round here, mister,” the sheriff says. “We don’t like strangers ‘round here.” That’s the feeling I got, but with the weird twist that everyone in the room seemed to know who I was. “You’re well known around here,” I expected somebody to say, “and we don’t like you around here.” I was not disappointed. That happened minutes later. After complimenting the attractive bartender on her necktie worn sans shirt collar, she finally poured a Blue Moon for me. A fine beer, Blue Moon, full bodied and rich. Speaking of full bodied, rich blue moons, newly reelected 49th Ward Democrat Committeeman David Fagus slid out from the back room and gave me the sheriff’s fish eye. Moments later, Joe Moore’s errand boy Jim Ginderske came out as well, joined by a few regulars in from that movie. I was blocked, I realized, from going into the back room where 49th Ward Alderman Joe Moore was sitting, with Steans and some of her people. Reporter Swanson was back there; I know this because I saw her come out from the back room minutes later. Reporters from “real” media, but no “bloggers” was the policy of the evening. So, I was fingered for expulsion. A semi-attractive woman approached me from behind. Robert, the older man drinking an apple martini with whom I was having a friendly conversation with, suddenly seemed alarmed as he peered over my shoulder. “Uh oh,” he muttered. I turned around and saw the fiery eyed, semi-attractive woman glaring at me. Thank God her eyes were not guns. “You need to leave,” she said flatly. “Really? Why?” I asked. “You’re not here to celebrate,” she said. “You’re being disruptive.” I was hurt, really hurt. “But I am here to celebrate,” I said. “What are you celebrating?” she asked incredulously. “Democracy in action,” I said honestly, “ain’t it beautiful?” She was not amused, nor was she touched by my love of democracy. “You’re not here to celebrate Heather’s win.” “Are you only letting media people in who are here to celebrate Heather’s win?” I asked. “Would you eject a reporter from a paper whose editors had supported Suzanne Elder?” “You’re a blogger,” she nearly spat. “And you wrote bad things about Heather on your blog.” “You mean like she’s backed by the Machine?” I asked. "That's true. Look around the room." “I’m asking you to leave, this is a private party.” I had to give her that. The sign on the door did notify those entering that this was a private affair. But again, a reporter from the News-Star was there. Did the Steans people send her an invitation? Was the News-Star reporter there to “celebrate Heather’s win?” I left peacefully, without causing a scene. But as I left, I shook hands with Jim Ginderske, Terry Feingold and Francis Scudellari. To their credit, they know how to behave civilly in public. This just pissed off my antagonist even more. Before I left, a heavy woman approached. She was not hip to what the little drama going on, and cheerfully approached us to make small talk. She wore a button that said “HEATHER’S,” and just under that it said “Sister-In-Law.” “Gee,” I said, “I just love your button! Very cute, very clever.” She was smitten. “Thanks!” “Why, I’ll bet there can’t be more than two of those in the world!” I said. “Well actually, there are four,” she said, holding up four fingers to emphasize the quantity. Then, pointing at my antagonist, she said, “And she’s got one of them.” Ah ha, so the semi-attractive pit bull is one of Heather Steans’s sisters in law. Interesting family. I left, satisfied that I had picked the right candidate to not support. It’s a long road to November. The Bench will enjoy every day of it. Let’s hope Heather does, too.

Blogger Ejected From Bitter Victory Party

Most political victory parties are happy affairs, with happy people. Most political victory parties feature a smiling, newly victorious politician who is eager to shake hands and build new bridges.

Not Steans. She showed herself to be a sore winner, eager to isolate herself from the public.

Not so with the strangely somber victory party of Heather Steans. She won the Democratic Primary for Illinois State Senator, getting and overall 63.27% of the vote in a two-way race against Suzanne Elder.

I went to the Elder election night party, which was held in the bar above Hamburger Mary's on N. Clark in Andersonville. Everybody knew at 7:30 p.m. that Elder had lost, yet the crowd was lively, upbeat, happy. Suzanne Elder herself was all smiles, cordial, and gracious. She bought me beer and posed for a photo. I ran into Lorraine Swanson of the News-Star paper there, too.

At approximately 9:30 I left the Elder party. I'd heard earlier in the day that the Steans party would be at Pepitone's at 5437 N. Broadway. I thought I'd pay it a visit, just to see who was there.

I walked into the Steans party at 10:05 p.m. The difference in tone between this, the winner's party, and that of the loser's party was stark. As mentioned above, Elder lost but her party was fun. Steans won but her party was down, somber, and a bitterness pervaded the air.

I went straight to the bar and engaged in a friendly conversation with two men. One guy, "Robert," asked my name. Before I could respond the younger man next to him, who I have never seen before, said, "That's Tom Mannis."

READ PART TWO HERE...

Photos: Anti-Torture Protest, Chicago

People gathered at the Post Office at Adams and and Dearborn in Chicago's downtown on Friday evening, January 11, 2008 to protest torture, from Gitmo to the Chicago Police. It was peaceful. People were relaxed, smiling. Then, suddenly, hundreds of the Evil Fascist Dictator Bush's Dark Warriors mowed them all down with machine guns. No, wait. I'm just kidding about that last thing.