“I would hope that a wise White man with the richness of his experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a Latina female who hasn’t lived that life,” said Judge Sonia Sotomayor. Oh, wait a minute, sorry. Sotomayer didn't make
that racist statement. She made
this racist statement:
“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”
She made that blatantly racist remark at the annual Judge Mario G. Olmos Law and Cultural Diversity Lecture at the University of California, Berkeley in 2001,
as reported by the New York Times.
Sotomayer is the radical leftist judge that radical leftist Barack Obama intends to nominate to be on the U.S. Supreme Court. Obama is currently pretending to be the legal President of the United States (until his hidden Kenyan
birth certificate turns up).
Obama calls the racist Sotomayer "inspiring." That's nice, isn't it?
In 2005, Sotomayer came off sounding like a complete fool when she essentially admitted to believing that appeals courts should take advocacy roles and make law. (Courts are not supposed to make law; they are supposed to enforce laws that are made by legislative bodies.)
Watch the video on YouTube.
The Sotomayer confirmation hearings will be wicked. Republicans will oppose it enthusiastically. Count on it. Also count on a number of Democrats shying away from defending such an openly bigoted person. A few, that is. Unfortunately, too many of the Democrat party leaders have been compromised by the far Left - or are part and parcel of it. Sadly, the party that once stood for equality now has a titular head who calls a racist like Sotomayer "inspiring."
This is a symptom of the Left's hypocrisy on racism. You see, if a liberal or a Democrat makes a racist statement, it's not really racist. Let a conservative make a racist statment and the Left jumps all over them. I don't condone racist statements, but the Left's double standing can be breathtaking. It's not unique to the American Left, either. In Britain, for example, Leftists call the British National Party (BNP) "racist." BNP responds this way:
Opponents point to the fact that the BNP has an all-white membership, and that we address issues concerning white people. If the BNP is racist for holding this position, then, we would suggest, all of the following organisations - some of them state funded - are also “racist” because they too address themselves exclusively to the issues and concerns of their respective communities:
BNP goes on to list 32 organizations in Britain that are clearly race based and set up for one ethnic or racial group, such as "
Operation Black Vote." BNP then asks the question:
"Have you noticed how the media NEVER calls any of these organisations “racist” even though they are openly organised along ethnic lines and stand for the rights of their respective communities? It seems as if every group has the right to have an organisation speaking up for its rights - EXCEPT the indigenous British people." (Source)
Back to the U.S., where there is a group called the Congressional Black Caucus. Can you imagine the cries of "racism!" if some U.S. Representatives formed a "Congressional White Caucus?" Of course you can, yet the mainstream media, liberals and Democrats kiss the CBC's collective booty. It's a double standard, and that's another way of saying hypocrisy. So, is the Congressional Black Caucus really racist, just because it's oriented toward Black Americans? No, not really, and I'll quote BNP again:
In reality, none of these organisations are “racist” — each and every community has the inalienable right to look after its own interests.
There you go. The right to associate with whom you wish, which is supported by all conservatives. Not the Left, however, who would scream bloody murder if some enterprising publisher started a magazine called "White Hair." Think about it.
RELATED:
Leave a Comment on our Guestbook!
CommieBama Hats and More - Whoa, cool!
Follow ChiNewsBench on Twitter
Chicago News Bench RSS Feed
civil rights group is expected to condemn what it calls racist elements in the Tea Party movement." ABC also notes that the NAACP, "in coordination with 170 other groups, including labor unions, is planning a protest march in Washington, D.C., Oct. 2 as the next step in building momentum against the Tea Party."
Two of the responses appear in full below. One is from Isaac Hayes, a Republican and Black American who is running against Jesse Jackson, Jr. for Congress in Illinois. The other is from the Rockford Tea Party. Not only is the NAACP's attack unwarranted, it is completely hypocritical. The NAACP attacked the Tea Parties on the basis of false and entirely racist premises and - no doubt - at the request of their true masters, the Democrat Party.
The NAACP's condemnation of the Tea Parties (note that it's plural; there is not a single "Tea Party") has been coordinated with the Obama Regime. While Comrade Obama promised us a "post racial America," he and those around him have done everything they could to widen the existing divisions between White and Non-White Americans.
The NAACP's condemnation of the Tea Parties is hypocritical, and is proven so by their lack of condemnation of outrageously racist statements by the New Black Panther Party (NBPP), one of which called for the killing of "crackers" and "cracker babies." The liberal and hypocritical Mainstream Media, of course, is not reporting that story. Listen to the Malik Zulu Shabazz, head of the NBPP try to spin away the seriousness of a NBPP member's call to "kill some crackers." Shabazz calls himself a Muslim, and in 2002 he praised Osama bin Laden (after the World Trade Centers were destroyed).
There are many other examples like these, including one in which author, vegan and paranoid racist psychopath Kamau Kambon called for the extermination of White people in a speech on C-SPAN (the real weirdness starts at 2:32 in that video; he talks about "how we are going to exterminate White people" at 8:30 into the video). Where was the outrage by Black "leaders" and "civil rights groups" over these over-the-top racist screeds? Meanwhile, the Obama Regime's Department of "Justice" is shielding the extremist NBPP.
Is this just right-wing spin? Is National Geographic right-wing? They describe the NBPP this way: "The New Black Panther Party advocates black nationalism and anti-Americanism." Watch their shocking video about the NBPP here.
The reactions from Tea Parties to the NAACP across the nation was almost instant and predictable: Counter condemnation. One of the more powerful reactions came from the St. Louis Tea Party, which published a resolution of their own condemning the NAACP. (See the equally powerful resolution from the Rockford Tea Party, below.)
Deneen Borelli is a Black woman and contributor to BigGovernment.com. She wrote a very short but powerful retort to the NAACP that is titled "I Condemn the NAACP: The New Black Panther Party Are the Real Racists." Borelli wrote, "I condemn the NAACP. Instead of criticizing tea parties, the NAACP would be better served denouncing the racist comments made by a member of the New Black Panther Party and its voter intimidation outside a Philadelphia polling place in the last presidential election. As a frequent speaker at tea party rallies around the country, I can assure the NAACP that the tea party movement’s concerns are about President Obama’s policies and not his race."
GOP'S ISAAC HAYES CONDEMNS NAACP:
CHICAGO: Republican nominee for Illinois 2ndCongressional District Isaac Hayes released the following statement regarding the NAACP's vote to condemn the Tea Party movement.
"Today’s vote by the NAACP to condemn the Tea Party movement highlights its ignorance of the history of the Tea Party movement and reminds us it has not changed its tactics in 100 years. A quick survey of American history will reveal the first American to shed blood in the American Revolution was both a Tea Partier and Black by the name of Crispus Attucks.
"Black Conservatives are no stranger to the race-based machinations of the NAACP. It was the organization's founder W.E.B. Du Bois who castigated Booker T. Washington as a sell-out because he argued for self-empowerment. Yet, Mr. Du Bois joined forces with Margaret Sanger who would later found Planned Parenthood, an organization responsible for the deaths of over 15 million African American babies.
"Instead of wasting its time trying to curtail the exercise of liberty, the NAACP concerns would be better directed toward the gang violence and illiteracy that plagues Minority communities across this country. Therefore, I condemn the NAACP for its perpetuation of racial division and hate."
Hayes's statement also appears on the Citizens for Isaac Hayes website.
FROM THE ROCKFORD TEA PARTY:
RockfordTeaParty Joins with the St. Louis Tea Party Coalition who created this Resolution in Condemning the NAACP
Rockford Tea Party Resolution
July 14, 2010
Whereas, the National Coalition for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) was founded to advance the position of minority groups, and
Whereas a hallmark of the NAACP has been to do the important work of identifying and exposing remaining vestiges of racism and discrimination, and
Whereas the NAACP vocally stands against the discriminatory and harmful practice of labeling people with a broad brush, and
Whereas the NAACP decided to launch their 101st National Convention with a resolution condemning the Tea Party movement and labeling millions of their fellow Americans who subscribe to the movement as "racists", and
Whereas the "Tea Party movement" is a label applied to patriotic Americans who have expressed their political free speech in the grand tradition of all that is American, that being the spirited expression of viewpoints in a 100% peaceful manner, and
Whereas, it is a hallmark of America that we settle our disputes civilly and avoid the gutter tactic of attempting to silence opponents by inflammatory name-calling, and
Whereas the very term "racist" has diminished meaning due to its overuse by political partisans including members of the NAACP, and
Whereas, the NAACP had an opportunity to preserve some semblance of legitimacy by standing up for Ken Gladney, the victim of a vicious racist battery conducted by a black avowed communist, even labeling him an "Uncle Tom", but chose instead to use the opportunity to mock the St. Louis Tea Party, and
Whereas, the NAACP has refused to denounce the New Black Panther's call to murder white cops and their babies, and
Whereas, the NAACP does its entire membership a grave disservice by hypocritically engaging in the very conduct it purports to oppose,
Now therefore be it resolved that the Rockford Tea Party joins the St. Louis Tea Party to condemn the NAACP for lowering itself to the dishonorable position of a partisan political attack dog organization, and,
Be it further resolved that the RockfordTeaParty joins the St. Louis Tea Party calling on similar organizations to join in unanimous condemnation of this despicable behavior, and
Be it further resolved that we demand that the NAACP withdrawal their bigoted, false and inflammatory resolution against the tea party for any further consideration, and
Be it further resolved that these organizations call on the Internal Revenue Service to evenly apply their standards and consider the tax-exempt status of the NAACP considering the degree to which they are engaging in habitual partisan political behavior.
Adopted unanimously, this day, July 12th, in the year of our Lord, 2010.
A copy of this resolution shall be sent immediately to the NAACP at: washingtonbureau@naacpnet.org
1) Okay, is language a racial trait? (Answer: Nope.)
2) How about criminal activity? (Nope again.)
3) Are illegal aliens in the US all from a single ethnic or racial group? (Again, no.)
Democrats love to act as if the answer to each of the above is "yes." Disagree with a lot 
