Showing posts with label bailout. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bailout. Show all posts

Greek Parliament Passes New Austerity Program | 'Explosion of Rage' as Rioters Torch Buildings, Police

February 13, 2012:  GREECE'S PARLIAMENT HAS PASSED A NEW AUSTERITY PROGRAM in the very early morning hours of Monday, February 13 (local date). The MPs voted even as the streets outside were in violent turmoil, the result of riots that started several days ago.

"The historic vote paves the way for Greece's European partners and the International Monetary Fund to release euro130 billion ($171 billion)," the Associated Press reports, "in new rescue loans without which Greece would default on its debt mountain next month and likely leave the eurozone — a scenario that would further roil global markets.

"After three days of rioting, the Greek parliament Sunday approved a new set of austerity measures that are likely to cause much pain for its already-struggling citizens," says an Associated Press report. "The measures clear the way for the nation to reduce its debt and gain another bailout from the other European nations and the International Monetary Fund. Greeks took to the streets Friday in protest of cuts including a 22-percent drop in the minimum wage. This comes with the unemployment rate over 20 percent and the economy in the fifth year of a recession. Riots and fires continued all throughout the weekend."

Greece fire ~ The Telegraph
"The 200-74 vote was passed against a backdrop of serious violence on the streets Athens," says The Telegraph (UK), "and in other Greek towns and cities, including the holiday islands of Corfu and Crete."

Rioting has been destructive in Athens. This has the potential of increasing the intensity of the violent protests. Greek leftists have been using destruction and violence to protest the of deep cuts in government programs and employment if Greece adopts yet another austerity program. Rioters have thrown petrol bombs  and Molotov cocktails at police and torched more than 10 buildings, some historic. The government is faced with complete insolvency if it does not take more, very deep austerity measures.

Violence erupted on Sunday as over 100,000 protesters marched to parliament to rally against drastic austerity cuts that will axe one in five public service jobs and slash the minimum wage by more than a fifth. In October, 2011 the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and European nations gave Greece a new aid package. That was in addition to the May, 2010 bailout of 110 billion euros. It was hoped that those funds would help Greece to survive until 2016. It was not enough, however.

Athens police attacked with petrol bomb ~ Daily Mail
"On March 20, Greece faces a EUR14.4 billion bond redemption that it cannot pay unless it secures that aid," reported the Wall Street Journal today. "That has raised the specter of a disorderly default by the country, which would make it the first country in the history of the euro to do so."

Leftist protesters are using the wanton destruction of public and private property to protest the bitter medicine that's needed to cure Greece's catastrophic economic ills.

The rioters and their sympathizers have caused and cultivated those ills by demanding more and more socialism over the decades. Like a junkie who just realized he's run out of drugs, the rioters are reacting violently in an infantile attempt to get more.

"Police have fought running battles in central Athens," reports The Australian, "as Greek MPs debated legislation that would introduce severe austerity measures to stave off bankruptcy. The riots engulfed central Athens with at least 10 buildings in flames in mass protests as MPs prepared for the historic parliamentary vote on tough austerity measures. TV footage showed a three-storey corner building completely consumed by flames with riot officers looking on from the street, and firefighters trying to douse the blaze. A closed cinema, a bank, a mobile phone dealership, a glassware store and a cafeteria were among the burning buildings, the fire department said."

"Historic cinemas, cafes and shops went up in flames," says The Daily Mail, "as Greek riot police struggled to pin down black-masked anti-austerity protesters roaming around central Athens ... Youths fought with police outside parliament for hours."

Earlier, the Mail reported that "Legislators are hoping to secure the deeply unpopular multi-billion-euro bailout and avert what Prime Minister Lucas Papademos warned would be 'economic chaos'. But as parliament began debating the bill anger over the new round of cuts spread and riots broke out again outside the building."

Not content with destroying property, some rioters used homemade bombs in an attempt to kill or maim police: "The air over Syntagma Square outside parliament was thick with tear gas," The Mail say, "as riot police fought running battles with youths who smashed marble balustrades and hurled stones and petrol bombs."

To be fair, however, not all leftists in Greece are acting that way. Greece's Socialist party leader George Papandreou, says WSJ, again called on lawmakers on Sunday "to support a tough package of reforms the country must take to secure a new 130-billion-euro ($178 billion) aid package from its international creditors." Papandreou made his remarks before a parliamentary vote on a loan memorandum "with Greece's European partners and the International Monetary Fund," and he "defended the austerity measures despite widespread belief in his party that the previous loan terms had driven the economy deep into recession."

Prime Minister Lucas Papademos's government, says The Australian, is "an unlikely coalition of the majority Socialists and their main foes, the conservative New Democracy." They speculate that  the austerity measure is expected to "carry the vote, even by a narrow margin."

"There are very few such moments in the history of a nation," Finance Minister Evangelos Venizelos said. "Our country has an acute issue of survival," and "The question is not whether some salaries and pensions will be curtailed, but whether we will be able to pay even these reduced wages and pensions," he added. "When you have to choose between bad and worse, you will pick what is bad to avoid what is worse."
Enhanced by Zemanta

Parodies of the Clint Eastwood Chrysler Super Bowl Halftime Ad


February 7, 2012 - HERE THEY COME: The video spoofs of Chrysler's controversial Super Bowl   ad, "Halftime in America," that starred Clint Eastwood. Dozens of them are already up on the Internet, and more are coming. We've highlighted several of our favorites (so far) below.

It was inevitable of course. The ad upset a lot of people because they consider it to be too political, and so favorable to Barack Obama that some call it a "stealth" campaign ad for him.

The ad's star, Clint Eastwood, is being accused by many as being a shill for Obama, but Eastwood is saying that he (and the ad) did not endorse Obama in the ad, is not endorsing anybody at this time, and that he has given his fee to charity. Frankly, I have to agree with those who say this all a big deal about nothing, but it's fun to watch. Rush Limbaugh says he thinks Eastwood was "duped" into creating what is effectively a pro-Obama, pro-bailout propaganda piece. For this post, however, all I  care about is how much fun can be had with the Chrysler spot. And so...

Here are some the parodies (there are many already).

The first parody here was uploaded to YouTube today by ReasonTV (it was written by Remy and produced by Meredith Bragg; the full transcript follows):

This parody is not political, but it's so bizarre that I found myself laughing hysterically. "It's Halftime in Grand Rapids, Michigan" was uploaded by WSNX1040:

The next parody video was uploaded by ColdHollowFarms. It has an anti-Obama message:

Batman gets into the act, sort of, in "It's Halftime in America, Gotham City," uploaded by victormoreno7 to YouTube:

Next, RoboCop gets dragged into this. "Eminem Chrysler Superbowl Commercial Robocop Parody" goes for laughs. Uploaded by Van46 Digital to FunnyOrDie.com:


Finally, TheKloons added a parody simply called "Chrysler Commercial Parody" on YouTube:

Enhanced by Zemanta

Trouble For ShoreBank Bailout (Updated)

This is developing, just posted today by Chicago Breaking Business at 1:06 p.m. CDT. The shady bailout of ShoreBank is in deep doo-doo. Excerpts: By Becky Yerak - The bailout of Chicago-based ShoreBank has hit a serious snag as the Federal Reserve and Treasury drag their feet on whether to provide funding to the ailing South Side lender, sources close to the situation say. Last month ShoreBank lined up commitments from private sources, including Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, General Electric and Chase, for a capital infusion of about $135 million. That private money was to have made ShoreBank eligible for about $75 million in government funds from the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program. The bank has needed to raise about $200 million to stave off possible seizure. Rep. Jan Schakowsky must be having fits today, but the Tea Party Patriots Chicago is feeling pretty good about it: We are winning on the ShoreBank bailout issue. Last week, the Chicago Tea Party held a Stop the ShoreBank Bailout Rally with Joel Pollak and Issac Hayes.... Democrat Rep. Jan Schakowsky (IL-9) has done everything in her power to push for the bailout of ShoreBank, but is not receiving sufficient support from the Federal Reserve and the White House. Read more here... Yerak's report continues... Bill Brandt, chairman of the Illinois Finance Authority, a government financing body that has looked at ways to help ShoreBank, is disappointed by the developments. He says ShoreBank plays a unique role in helping downtrodden communities, particularly those in black neighborhoods. ”Given all the time and effort that went into this, the board of the Illinois Finance Authority, the local civic leaders on the South Side of Chicago and others I’d imagine, would be outraged over this development,” Brandt said. ”This is truly an example of the government moving the goal posts when they don’t want to lead,” he said. RELATED: BackyardConservative: A Congressional Investigation of ShoreBank Marathon Pundit: Anti-ShoreBank Tea Party Crony Capitalism Shores Up Shore Bank Chicago Daily Observer Congressional Republicans Calling For Investigation Into ShoreBank The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Saving Two Presidents ... Tea Party Protests Obama's Favorite Bank « The Foxhole

Chicago Rally Against ShoreBank Bailout on June 9

There will be a rally against the ShoreBank bailout on Wednesday, June 9 at 12:00 Noon at the downtown location of ShoreBank. That's 134 N. LaSalle Street, across the street from City Hall. Scheduled speakers include Joel Pollak, candidate for U.S. Congress (IL-9) and Isaac Hayes, candidate for U.S. Congress (IL-2). The event is organized by Tea Party Patriots Chicago (TPPC). They will be handing out fliers to educate the public on the corrupt, politically connected bailout of ShoreBank. "ShoreBank has received $35 million in stimulus funds, $75 million from companies that have received bailout money (Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, GE)," writes TPPC's Coordinator Steve Stevlic, "and now they're hoping to receive another $75 million in taxpayer money. ShoreBank provided Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Trinity United Church with a $10 million line of credit - now they need a bailout. We hope this rally can bring attention to this issue and help prevent this looting of our treasury." Stevlic says that ShoreBank hopes to cash-in on their high-level political connections with Barack Obama, Jan Schakowsky and her convicted felon husban Robert Creamer, Senator Dick Durbin, Van Jones and others. "At the very least," he says, "no taxpayer money should go to ShoreBank until there is a forensic audit of their finances." TPPC has more information at their website. Glenn Beck recently gave ShoreBank the blackboard treatment here: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 and Part 4. RELATED: ShoreBank Gets Help But Is Still Begging Failing ShoreBank, Cap-And-Trade and Jan Schakowsky

Why Is Peter Roskam Kissing Union Ass?

Peter Roskam seems confused. He represents the 6th Congressional District in Illinois. He calls himself a Republican and he's running for re-election. Did he think it would be a wise move to support currently proposed legislation for a bailout of troubled union pension funds? In theory, the bill could add $165 billion to the of American taxpayers' already heavy burden. The bill is being introduced by Senator Bob Casey, (D-Pa.), who says it will save jobs and help people, and Roskam supports it. The bill in question will essentially let multi-employer union pension plans, like the Teamster's plan that is currently causing UPS so much trouble, segregate out the workers of defunct companies and get the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corp to pony up for their benefits. Media Matters says that the bailout won't cost $165 billion, and they're right; that's the total liabilities of the plan. Theoretically, it could cost $165 billion if every single employer went bankrupt, but that's not a very likely scenario. More at The Atlantic... NetRightDaily reports that "Americans for Limited Government (ALG) has sent a letter to 9 House Republicans urging that they withdraw their support from legislation providing a taxpayer bail-out of labor union run pension funds. Among the union pension funds in critical danger are those run by the Major League Baseball Players Association (MLBPA), the National Football League Players Association (NFLPA) and more than a hundred other union-run funds." Roskam is one of the nine Congressmen to get that letter. Read more at NetRightDaily.com Roskam has a reputation as a good conservative, so his support of Casey's union bailout bill seems bizarre. Roskam has a good "general favorability towards Republicans" according to National Journal Online's 2009 Vote Ratings with score of 76.0. That's "good," but it's far from perfect. (Compare it to Mark Kirk's 60.7 rating.) (Hat tip to TeaPartyElections.)

ShoreBank Gets Help But Is Still Begging

MAY 18, 2010: GE joins effort to save Chicago community bank‎ (Reuters) Privately owned ShoreBank, a community development lender on Chicago's South Side near the home base of President Barack Obama and some of his top aides, is getting assistance from a consortium of Wall Street banks including Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS.N), Citigroup (C.N), JPMorgan (JPM.N) and Bank of America (BAC.N), sources have said. Spokesmen for Citigroup and General Electric Co (GE.N) each confirmed $20 million investments on Tuesday, and JP Morgan previously said it was ready to inject $15 million. Another source said Goldman injected $20 million. However... The Financial Times reported (on May 19, GMT) that "Two people familiar with the deal said the next test for the bank was whether or not it could raise an additional $70m from the federal government." That would be in addition to the money from Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and GE Capital. The American Spectator is almost as suspicious about the bailout of ShoreBank as we are here at Chicago News Bench. On May 17, they wrote that "Republicans on the House Financial Services Committee want to find out if anyone in the Obama White House attempted to influence the financial bailout of a well-known Chicago-based 'community bank,' which faced FDIC closure last week, and which, going back to the Clinton Administration, has had close ties to ACORN and the leftist community-organizing world of Chicago. The story about the bailout attempt of ShoreBank first began breaking last Thursday night. The FDIC was demanding that the bank have $125 million in investments by Friday, but discussions to bail out the bank, which has close ties to both senior members of the Obama Administration, as well as the Clinton family, went deep into the weekend as Chicago politicians scrambled to save the bank." What? Last Thursday? Where the hell has American Spectator been? It was two weeks ago, on May 5, that we posted "Failing ShoreBank, Cap-And-Trade and Jan Schakowsky." In that post, I wrote that "This story is about much, much more than just ShoreBank. It's about corruption, the $10 Trillion cap-and-trade scam, the continuing attempt by Schakowsky and the Democrats to seize control of America's energy policies, and more. It's about the Joyce Foundation, which is a major shareholder of ShoreBank and also a major player in the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX). CCX trades in 'greenhouse gases.' Franklin Raines, George Soros, Al Gore, Goldman Sachs, Barack Obama and others are big players in this story. (At this point, I strongly suggest that you watch Glenn Beck explain the twisted story of the Chicago Climate Exchange and the Joyce Foundation.)Over the past decade, 'green' ShoreBank has become a shill and a front for the cap-and-trade crowd and those with a radical environmentalist agenda." Fourteen days ago, we called out the corruption of the ShoreBank situation. We were certainly not the first ones to do so, by any means, but American Spectator makes it sound as though the connection was only realized when the FDIC was trying to rush through a bailout for ShoreBank. The stench surrounding ShoreBank, Schakowsky, the Clintons, the Obamas and many others wafts back years. The odiferous mess is only now getting the attention that it should have gotten long ago.

Failing ShoreBank, Cap-And-Trade and Jan Schakowsky (Updated)

UPDATE, MAY 17, 2010: ShoreBank rescue talks continue, Crain's Chicago Business UPDATE, MAY 14, 2010 - Sachs + Schakowsky + ShoreBank = Shakedown by Joel Pollak at BigGovernment.com: "Today it was reported that Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein has been calling Wall Street friends to cough up $125 million to save ShoreBank, which faces federal closure next week. Rep. Jan Schakowsky suggested in January that Illinois taxpayers foot the bill. That would have been the first state-led bank bailout in U.S history. The idea was abandoned–so it appears the government is shaking down Goldman Sachs instead." ALSO SEE: Shorebank Failure Could Cause Obama To Go Ballistic on Wall Street - May 14, 2010 May 5, 2010 - Chicago - What is it with Illinois Democrats and failing banks? Recently, the bank owned by the family of Illinois State Treasurer Alex Giannoulias failed. Broadway Bank was shut down by the feds and was absorbed by MB Financial on April 23. Giannoulias is running for U.S. Senate against Republican Mark Kirk.
This week, we get word of another pending failure of a Chicago area bank - this one favored and coddled by U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky.
On May 4, Crain's Chicago Business reported that "Federal banking regulators have begun the process of accepting bids for ShoreBank Corp. in the event the community lender can’t raise the $200 million it needs to avoid failing." (The failed Broadway Bank needed something like $90 million to avoid failing.) Crain's also reported that "Under an amended regulatory order with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and the Illinois Division of Banking, ShoreBank has until May 21 to raise the needed equity. But regulators have been known to seize banks before their capital-raising deadlines." This story is about much, much more than just ShoreBank. It's about corruption, the $10 Trillion cap-and-trade scam, the continuing attempt by Schakowsky and the Democrats to seize control of America's energy policies, and more. It's about the Joyce Foundation, which is a major shareholder of ShoreBank and also a major player in the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX). CCX trades in "greenhouse gases." Franklin Raines, George Soros, Al Gore, Goldman Sachs, Barack Obama and others are big players in this story. (At this point, I strongly suggest that you watch Glenn Beck explain the twisted story of the Chicago Climate Exchange and the Joyce Foundation.) Over the past decade, "green" ShoreBank has become a shill and a front for the cap-and-trade crowd and those with a radical environmentalist agenda. "In 2000," says the bank's website, "ShoreBank expanded its focus to include environmental issues, believing that communities cannot achieve true prosperity without also attaining environmental well-being." The Joyce Foundation, says SourceWatch, "is a key progenitor of carbon dioxide cap and trade. In 2000 the Foundation issued a $347,600 grant to Richard Sandor for a study on the feasibility of a cap and trade mechanism. In 2001 the Foundation issued a $760,100 grant to the J. L. Kellog School of Management at Northwestern University, working with Sandor, to fund the design of the Carbon Climate Exchange, otherwise known as the CCX. The CCX mechanism has been adopted by European carbon credit exchanges." How does Jan Schakowsky fit into all of this? She has been trying for some time to get a federal bailout for ShoreBank. An excellent report by The Central Illinois 9/12 Project, posted at BigGovernment, tells us the following (emphasis added):
In 2009, Shorebank received more than $35 million in federal funds for grants and new market tax credits. Despite this new flow of funds to extend to their customers and loan recipients, Shorebank reported a loss of $50 million in 2009 alone and was issued a “cease and desist” order by the FDIC and the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation. In addition, ShoreBank was receiving strong warnings from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. Their dire financial state had lead them to initially seek a “bailout” from the State of Illinois, promoted by Chicago Congresswoman Jan Shakowsky and Senator Dick Durbin. However, they have since decided that they can find capital without seeking state help.
Additionally (emphasis added):
In February [2010], Secretary Geithner proposed “enhancement” to TARP funds specifically aimed at community development banks that would allow them to receive capital investment funds at a 2% rate (compared to the standard 5% rate) and to receive federal TARP funds that would be matched to funding received from private institutions. Chicago Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky wants ShoreBank to be eligible for such funding and has even suggested that such funding would be equivalent to a jobs program for the area. “Plain and simple, this is a jobs program,” she says. “The funds from this program will go directly to the people and communities that need it most which will expedite hiring and rebuild a vibrant economy”.
The Central Illinois 9/12 Project piece asks a pointed question (emphasis added):
Will they do the unprecedented and become one of the first entities to be bailed out by a state that itself has a $13 billion deficit? With its promotion of green development and new carbon credit distribution, could Shorebank become one of the first banks to be deemed too “green” to fail?
Why is Rep. Schakowsky so eager to help ShoreBank? Follow the money. Anne Leary at Backyard Conservative posted this in January, 2010, written by Joel Pollak: Pollak is running against Schakowsky in the 9th Congressional District of Illinois.
After all, when the Bank of Lincolnwood failed last year, Rep. Schakowsky did not save it--and that bank, unlike ShoreBank, was in her own district. The answer may lie in the history of campaign contributions by ShoreBank executives and employees. Federal Election Commission records reveal that ShoreBank executives and employees gave thousands of dollars to Rep. Schakowsky and Sen. Durbin. They also gave heavily to Barack Obama's presidential campaign. Indeed, Crain's Chicago Business reports that "President Obama and the first lady are former neighbors of ShoreBank executives. Other ShoreBank-related contributions include Democrats across the country and left-wing organizations such as MoveOn.org. The ShoreBank bailout would seem to be more of the same Blagojevich-style, pay-to-play politics that Illinois has suffered under for too long."
Money is not the only factor for Schakowsky's support of ShoreBank. Ideology and power lust figure into the equation, too, and if "Auntie Jan" Schakowsky asks for it, there's a good chance that "the unprecedented" bailout of a bank by a state could indeed happen, especially with the "green" aspect thrown in. Democrats seem to go into a trance when anything is described as "green." ShoreBank is "a key to green jobs," and that makes them the darling of Democrats and liberals. They drool over themselves, blind to any faults that the "green" institution may have, because the carbon credit distribution scheme holds such a huge potential for (a) massive profits for the insiders who participate, (b) systemic control by bureaucrats of (i) industry and (ii) social engineering, and (3) huge kickbacks in the form of money contributed by the insiders who participate. The story of Giannoulias' failed Broadway Bank pales in comparison to the story of ShoreBank. Broadway Bank earned notoriety for loans made to known criminals. ShoreBank, on the other hand, is part of a story so massive, so profoundly criminal at its roots, that it may take years to sort it all out. ShoreBank, unlike Broadway bank, has had protection from people at the highest levels of the federal government and from within the "green" non-profit cabals. What we are seeing currently is the tip of an iceberg so massive that we may never see the bottom of it. RELATED: ShoreBank sees another $101M loss just ahead Crain's Chicago Business ShoreBank seeks bailout from large banks Crain's Chicago Business Rep. Jan Schakowsky continues to back ShoreBank Joel Pollak ShoreBank: Too Green to Fail? BigGovernment The Star Players in the ShoreBank Story Central Illinois 9/12 Project Scandal: Obama, Gore, Goldman, Joyce Foundation CCX partners to fleece USA Examiner.com Who Will Profit From Cap-And-Trade? You May Be Surprised Neal Boortz The $10 Trillion Climate Fraud Investor's Business Daily Al Gore to Become World's First Global Warming Billionaire AtlanticRight.com Video: Cap and Trade Con Exposed (How Goldman Sachs Made Billions)... YouTube Glenn Beck Explains the Chicago Climate Exchange (Part 1) YouTube Glenn Beck Explains the Chicago Climate Exchange (Part 2) YouTube Gore, Goldman, and Cap and Trade - Tangled Web of Corruption Investor Village Questioning The Value Of The Chicago Climate Exchange Progress Illinois

Nurse Warns, "Don't Let Them Fool You" About Health Care

This is a powerful video (in two parts), that should be included in the discussion of proposed government-run health care. The nurse, "L.C," spoke at a Tea Party rally in Scranton , PA on August 21. The description of the video says, "L.C. (a Nurse) brings her expertise on the business end of Healthcare issues our elected 'officials' fail to see and proceeds to other national interest that led to the Tea Parties." Scranton Tea Party II part A: Scranton Tea Party II part B: (Also see this related video.) Cool Hats & Shirts for Cool Conservatives Leave a Comment... Chicago News Bench RSS Feed We're on Twitter...

Krauthammer Nails Geithner, Dodd, Obama on AIG

Charles Krauthammer wrote a must-read column for tomorrow's Washington Post (dated March 20, 2009). Krauthammer hit the nail on the head (get it?) when he mocks Obama's Regime of Stupidity. What makes it all the more powerful is that the column is so damned accurate. He starts of with this: A $14 trillion economy hangs by a thread composed of (a) a comically cynical, pitchfork-wielding Congress, (b) a hopelessly understaffed, stumbling Obama administration, and (c) $165 million. In case you've been hiding under your bed for the past week, that $165 million is a reference to the controversial bonus money paid out to AIG executives. Krauthammer continues: AIG debt manipulators who may be the only ones who know how to defuse the bomb they themselves built. Now, in the scheme of things, $165 million is a rounding error. It amounts to less than 1/18,500 of the $3.1 trillion federal budget. It's less than one-tenth of 1 percent of the bailout money given to AIG alone. If Bill Gates were to pay these AIG bonuses every year for the next 100 years, he'd still be left with more than half his personal fortune. To watch Barney Frank chair his kangaroo court of a committee as it grilled AIG's CEO Edward Liddy is to watch an overproduced, melodramatic slight of hand by the worst bunch of magicians to ever attempt to pull rabbits out of hats in the history of Washington, DC. Liddy, by the way, inherited the lousy contracts that allowed the huge bonuses. Liddy himself got no bonus, and in fact he only get $1.00 (that's one dollar) per year for his task of cleaning up the AIG house. Liddy testified yesterday to Frank's kangaroo court that he is not financially vested in AIG in any way. The Obama Regime approved the bonuses for AIG. In fact, Treasury demanded that they be allowed, for fear that not allowing them would ignite a firestorm of lawsuits. Senator Chris Dodd (D-Conn) initially denied having anything to do with the allowance of the bonuses to stay in even as the government was about to give AIG about $180 Billion in bailout money. Dodd also denied that Treasury officials asked him to change the bailout legislation. CNN, however, reports that "Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner confirmed Thursday that the department did talk to Sen. Chris Dodd about a clause he put forth in the stimulus legislation that would have strictly limited executive bonuses." Ah ha. So Dodd lied. Treasury, which is overseen by Obama appointee Geithner, urged that the AIG bonuses be allowed. So, does that mean Obama himself knew about the preservation of the bonuses? If not, does that mean that Obama doesn't know what's going on? Perhaps both. Back to Krauthammer, who takes that into consideration and notes that Obama "too, has been out there trying to lead the mob" in calling for an investigation into the AIG bonuses and for the return of the bonus money. It's slight of hand, as I said. Obama & Company don't want you to know that the AIG bonuses were approved by Geithner, a top administration official. So by pretending to be outraged, Obama is hoping you'll be distracted from the fact that, well, he's really not outraged and undoubtedly knew that Geithner had urged the bonuses to be allowed. "But it's a losing game," writes Krauthammer, "His own congressional Democrats will out-demagogue him and heap the blame on the hapless Timothy Geithner." Thank God for hapless flunkies like Tim Geithner. They're handy to have on hand when one needs a scapegoat. Right now, Dodd is running for re-election in 2010. The news of his lies and deception about his role in the AIG bonus mess has not helped his polling. His Republican challenger is former U.S. Rep. Rob Simmons. According to The Hartford Courant's Stan Simpson, Simmons is now ahead in early polling agains Dodd. Simpson notes this about Dodd in his March 19 column: This latest story of [Dodd's] flip-flopping about his role in approving language to allow these shameless AIG bonuses may be the last straw for CT's senior senator. His election is in 2010. His credibility, when you factor in his deception and delay in forwarding info about his financial dealings with Countrywide, is near shot. If only there could be another presidential election next year. Chicago News Bench RSS Feed Cool Stuff...

Stimulus Math Frightening

The total cost of the Obama Stimulus just for Illinois will be at least $3,108,484,657. That's the total of cost of all the projects submitted by Illinois... so far. How does that break down, what does it mean to YOU? No need for a calculator out, a commenter at Illinois Review did the math for us: > 3.108 billion divided by 13 million [Illinois] residents is 239 per person. 956 for a family of 4. > The 3 trillion of all the bailout/ stimulus/ porkulus/ obamu-us divided by 13 million is 230,000 per person, 920,000 for a family of 4. > If the government borrows the money at 3% that is 27,600 interest cost per family of 4. > 27,600 - 956 = 26,644 net loss per Illinois family. > And this is the way we stimulate the economy? No, it's how you stimulate Big Government. Yah, this is "change," but not for the better. Tea Party on April 15, anybody? Chicago News Bench RSS Feed Cool Stuff (Stimulate me!)

Time For Another Tea Party?

Bill Wyckoff ponders the question at KansasLiberty.com. "Life is not risk free, and a rich uncle isn’t going to come to my rescue,' says Main Street Money-man Bill Wyckoff. Especially not Uncle Sam, who's not only not rich, he's broke!" Wyckoff makes an argument for more tea party protests. A good read, recommended. Chicago News Bench Merchandise Chicago News Bench RSS Feed

John Galt's Spirit Rises, Anti-Stimulus Protests Beginning

Free thinkers across America, take note! Anti-Stimulus (or "Anti-Porkulus") protests are beginning. They will spread. They will get bigger as they spread. Good friend Anne Leary at Backyard Conservative has compiled a neat list of Anti-Stimulus protest action so far. Go take a look at her post "Anti-Porkulus Rally in Denver," then read Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand. Ready? Put your weary shoulders back and organize your own Anti-Stimulus protest event! Do it for John Galt. RELATED: 'Atlas Shrugged': From Fiction to Fact in 52 Years - WSJ.com CNB RSS Feed

Mark Kirk On WGN Tonight, Will Talk Stimulus

Tune in to WGN Radio at 6:38 p.m - Congressman Mark Kirk (R-IL) will be talking stimulus with host Steve Cochran on WGN 720 AM. You can listen online at http://www.wgnradio.com/ Congressman Kirk is in in his fifth term of representing Chicgao's northern suburbs. Kirk also serves on the Appropriations Committee and is a Navy Reservist. RELATED: Kudos to Kirk for vote on House bill CNB RSS Feed

It's Ayn Rand's World, We Just Live In It

If you think you understand the current economic crisis, you're wrong. Nobody really understands it, especially not Timothy Geithner, our dunce Treasury Secretary whose brilliant stupidity caused the stock market to plummet yesterday by more than 400 points. If you want to get a better feeling for the current global malaise, however, there are several books you must read: Atlas Shrugged, by Ayn Rand 1984, by George Orwell Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley Alice in Wonderland, by Lewis Carroll There's also a concise little blog post worthy of your attention over at Conservablogs. The title (which I love) is "Newsweek: Celebrating America as a New, Socialist France," and is written by friend Warner Todd Huston. The post is a primer into the world of Orwellian New Speak, distorted presentations of reality a la Carroll and Huxley, all mired in the shrugging shoulders of America in the here and now that Rand envisioned some 60 years ago. Rand had a crystal ball. She must have. The Conservablogs piece skewers a Newsweek article for it's shrugging shoudlers and Carrollian-Orwellian-Huxleyesque viewpoints on the economic crisis, the attempts by government (Big Brother) to save us all, and general stupidity: Newsweek’s Jon Meacham and Evan Thomas are tired of all this talk of socialism. We need to stop talking about yesterday’s news, they say, and embrace the great new fact that America is already a socialist country. They chortle that America is just like France. Meacham and Thomas chide Sean Hannity for using socialism as a dirty word because it “seems strangely beside the point.” The pair is enthusiastic about our new American socialist society! "Strangely beside the point" is straight out of Orwell's 1984. It is New Speak pychobabble, stating precisely the opposite of truth, turning reality on its head. When Hannity and other critics of the stimulus - or any Big Government spending orgy - use the term "socialism" to describe it, they are accurate. It is, in fact, socialism. Indeed, the term "stimulus" as applied to the "bailout" is Orwellian. Explain, if you will, how borrowing over a trillion dollars (don't forget the interest, folks) to "stimulate" the economy is not Orwellian. In fact, the "stimulus" will stunt any recovery. The irony is that while America is moving toward European-style socialism, Europe itself is abandoning it. The Europeans have been experimenting with socialism in a serious way much longer than we have in the US. They have seen the future, and they didn't like it. Obama, Reid and Pelosi, on the other hand, have seen the European past and want to jump into it. In a column titled "Europe Retreats from Socialism," Joseph Farah points out that irony: How ironic is it that the U.S. is embracing socialism at the very moment Europe and many other parts of the world are running away from it? Somebody needs to ask Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi about this. In the past five years, 33 countries, including 20 in socialist Europe, always held up as the example for a new American economic model by Democrats, have cut their personal income taxes, according to a study by KPMG, the giant accounting firm. In the past four years, 60 countries have cut their corporate income tax rates. The politicians in the US seem oblivious to the fact that Europe is weening itself off of socialism, and that has allowed us to move in a direction that the Europeans know leads to disaster. And so, we got the "stimulus" package. The "stimulus" is this: The government will pump hundreds of billions of dollars (your dollars, Taxpayer) into the economy, but in dribs and drabs over the next 2-3 years. They will do this by (a) continuing to grab your money via income deduction on your paychecks, (b) borrowing hundreds of billions (which taxpayers will have to repay), (c) taking your income taxes and that borrowed money and redistributing it, and (d) claiming that this is the best course of action and chiding you to be patient. The more expedient and more fair way to stimulate the economy is to cut out the middlemen (Congress, Treasury, banks) and slash everybody's payroll deductions immediately. Taxpayers would start to feel relief and stimulation on their next paycheck, which would be fatter, and most of them would go out and buy something. Things, lots of things. In other words, we could slash everyone's federal payroll deductions almost immediately. That would increase money in the people's pockets immediately. That would stimulate confidence and spending immediately, resulting in a rebound almost immediately. It's a non-socialist way to go. On the other hand, Washington has passed the "stimulus" legislation, ensuring the borrowing of hundreds of billions of dollars that taxpayers alive and yet to be born will be repaying for many decades. The money, an immediate total of just under 900 Billion dollars, will not be pumped into the economy quickly, but will literally take years to filter in. That's the socialist way to go, and that's the way Congress went. So, no Newsweek, more socialistic meddling is not the solution. And Meacham and Thomas are as wrong as wrong could be. We don’t need to shrug our shoulders and sigh in resignation because socialism is already here. We need to destroy it and return our system to its capitalist base. It's been said by pundits over the past few weeks that once Congress passes the stimulus package we'll be stuck with it forever. Well, they passed it. They passed it by voting on it. They could undo it with another vote, destroy the socialistic monster they've created, and return our system to its capitalist, less expensive, more fair base. RELATED: We Are All Socialists Now - Newsweek.com Why American Capitalism Succeeds and European Socialism Fails TheHill.com - Bush’s legacy: European socialism The Complete Newspeak Dictionary from George Orwell's 1984 European Socialism: - Associated Content European Socialism Doesn't Work - FOXNews European Socialism and its Massive Failure Europe retreats from socialism CNB RSS Feed

Stimulus Must-Reads at Illinois Review

Two must-read items today at Illinois Review. The teasers: Do What's Right.org calculates your bailout bill According to the calculator on Do What's Right.org if Obama succeeds, our household's federal income taxes will increase by 20 percent and we'll be paying $302 more a month to pay our fair share of the Democrats' stimulus package scheduled for a vote in the U.S. Senate tomorrow. (Click title for full article) Stimulus Watch lists billions for Illinois projects Illinois' $3,108,484,657 take in the federal stimulus package would fund the fourth highest number of state projects, following California's 1971, Florida's 1752 and Texas' 1240. Stimulus Watch's list is misleading, though, because Chicago is not included as one of over 100 Illinois cities whose mayors have submitted "shovel-ready" projects. Is your town listed? (Click title for full article) Those Illinois towns listed are below, sans links. To see the links and details of the the projects, get over to Illinois Review. Addison • Alsip • Alton • Amboy • Arlington Heights • Aurora • Bartlett • Blue Island • Bolingbrook • Bollingbrook • Bourbonnais • Bridgeview • Buda • Bureau Junction • Burnham • Calumet City • Canton • Carbon Hill • Carpentersville • Cedar Point • Channahon • Cherry • Chicago Heights • Cicero • Coal City • Crest Hill • Crystal Lake • Dalzell • Depue • Diamond • East Brooklyn • Elgin • Evanston • Frankfort • Gardner • Glendale Heights • Glenview • Glenwood • Grand Ridge • Granite City • Granville • Harvey • Hennepin • Hickory Hills • Highland Park • Hoffman Estates • Homer Glen • Homewood • Kangley • Kinsman • Lansing • LaSalle • Leland • Lombard • Lostant • Lynwood • Manhattan • Manlius • Mark • Marseilles • Matteson • Mazon • McNabb • Mineral • Moline • Morris • Naplate • Neponset • Niles • Normal • North Chicago • North Utica • Northbrook • Oak Brook • Oak Park • Oglesby • Olympia Fields • Orland Park • Ottawa • Palatine • Palos Park • Park Forest • Paw Paw • Peotone • Peru • Princeton • Quincy • Richton Park • Riverdale • Romeoville • Sandwich • Sauk Village • Schaumburg • Seatonville • Seneca • Sheffield • Sheridan • South Holland • South Wilmington • Spring Valley • Standard • Streator • Thornton • Tinley Park • Tiskilwa • Toluca • Tonica • Troy Grove • Varna • Verona • Watseka • Wenona • West Brooklyn • Woodridge • Worth • Wyanet (To see this list with full links, click here) CNB RSS Feed

BREAKING: BANK OF AMERICA GIVES IN, WILL HELP REPUBLIC WINDOWS...

The Bench front page... Bank of America blinked and will help Republic Windows & Doors LLC in Chicago, after all. But there are catches... Bank of America Offers Loans to Republic for Workers (Update1) Workers win: Bank to give credit to Chicago plant

BIG BANK OF AMERICA PROTEST, CHICAGO, DEC. 10

The Bench front page... An anonymous tipster let this be known to The Bench: A protest at Bank of America, 231 S. LaSalle (at Jackson) in downtown Chicago on Wednesday, December 10. (Say, wait a minute! That's "Day Without A Gay" day! There won't be anybody working at B of A!) There will be a protest at B of A headquarters 231 S. LaSalle, Chicago on Wednesday, December 10 at noon. Fran Tobin of "Jobs With Justice" is the person who told [The Bench's source] about this. Please stay informed. The protest was changed to Wednesday from Tuesday. Even if the Republic Windows and Doors matter is settled (BofA loans Republic enough to pay its workers their severance, sick pay and vacation) we will still gather to protestthe financialconsequences of the bailout wherein banks are paid but do not pass the benefiton to American workers.Hope to see you at 231 S. LaSalle on Wednesday at noon." Now, won't that be fun?

BAIL OUT, RESCUE, WASTE OF TIME?

That big "rescue" has not even been implemented yet... and already it's failing! Way to go, Big Government! I suppose that, out of fairness, we should give them a few years to let the "rescue" take effect. After all, it took years for Sen. Chris Dodd and Cong. Barney Frank and several of Barack Obama's top advisors to set up Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and lending institutions across the US for utter implosion. Way to go! The Dow Jones industrials are down more than 500 points, more than half their huge 936-point advance from Monday, and all the major indexes are down at least 5 percent. Angst over the economy is sending stocks plunging once again. A disappointing retail sales report has investors convinced that the banking crisis has caused cracks in the economy well beyond the financial sector and that a recession, if not already here, is inevitable. FULL STORY, AP...

House Passes Rescue Bill: Welcome to the USSA

The bastards sold us down the river. Welcome, Comrades, to the United Socialist States of Amerika. The House of Representatives approved a $700 billion bailout package for U.S. banks...by a vote of 263-171, sending the measure to President George W. Bush and concluding two weeks of legislative haggling in Congress that had roiled and captivated global markets. REUTERS... RELATED: Rape of nun confirmed

Anti-Schakowsky Sentiment a Sign of the Times

Follow along, Screwed-Americans. Here in Northern Illinois, there is justified anger toward Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky, who voted for the bailout earlier this week. Members of Congress face the wrath of the people, Left and Right, Democrat and Republican, for selling us out. Once again, the taxpayers are screwed. Below, we see an email chain that was sent out to a group this week, beginning on Wednesday and going through this morning. I know that the people involved are liberal Democrats (I've removed their names to protect their privacy). This bodes ill for Schakowsky, a nominally liberal Democrat herself, and for all other Representatives and Senators, Democrats and Republicans, who felt that the taxpayers should pay for the grotesque errors and greed of Wall Street... and of the criminal negligence for more than 13 years by both houses of Congress. Re: Jan Schakowsky voted for the bailout On 10/1/08 8:27 AM, "Xxx Xxxxxxx" wrote: I will never vote for her nor work for her again Vote in the National Cheney Impeachment Poll http://www.usalone.com/blogvoices.php?Cheney%20Impeachment%3F ---------------------------------------------- BENCH NOTE: I have to note the sadly funny, pitifully knee-jerk inclusion of the "Cheney Impeachment Poll" by one of the emailers. I mean, for God's sake, Cheney will only be in office for a few more months. These emailers are bitching about Cong. Schakowsky selling them out. Why isn't there a National Schakowsky Impeachment Poll? Or a National Barney Frank Impeachment Poll, a National Harry Reid Impeachment Poll, and so on??? Anyway... ---------------------------------------------- From: "Xxx, Xxxxxx" I heard the same, and was flabbergasted. She's very close to Pelosi (the latter was Jan's star guest at one of her women's power luncheons (I've attended two, but don't plan to give her money any more, either. We still have every right to ask her to do the right thing, telling what it is and why it's right. She's often not with us. Watch out for all of them! Whom do I trust the most? Dennis Kucinich! Who am I voting for? Cynthia McKinney (Green Party; if they get 5 percent of the vote nationwide I don't think my vote would matter for Obama) the Green Party will become an established party with a place on the national ballot. Surely they deserve as much a place as the Socialist Labor Party and the Socialist Workers Party! And her issues are right on; I've heard her on the radio. ---------------------------------------------- BENCH NOTE: Whoa! Gotta interject again! These people are bitching about Schakowsky selling them out but apparently do not understand the situation. If they did, they would not be calling for people to vote for the Socialists or the equally socialist Greens. Good Lord, do they not understand that one of the major causes of the current economic crisis is the socialist demands on the banks to loan billions to the subprime market? We are in trouble people, when folks like these emailers are pissed at Schakowsky, Pelosi and others, but then call for people who do even more damage far quicker than Pelosi and her Corruptocrats ever dreamed of! ---------------------------------------------- From: Xxxxxx@xxxxxxxx Sent: Oct 1, 2008 12:10 PM To: [email group] Subject: Re: Jan Schakowsky voted for the bailout sad, Obama needs all of the votes he can get. the alternative is unthinkable! ---------------------------------------------- BENCH NOTE: HOLY COW! Sure, get Obama in there, uh huh. Are these people completely ignorant of the facts? Obama took over $120,000 in donations from Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae! Names like Johnson, Gorelick and Raines figure prominently in the scandals - and in Obama's campaign. As Investors Business Daily wrote on Sept. 22, "Though some key Republicans deserve blame as well, it was a concerted Democratic effort that made reform of Fannie and Freddie impossible. The reason for this is simple: Fannie and Freddie became massive providers both of reliable votes among grateful low-income homeowners, and of massive giving to the Democratic Party by grateful investment bankers, both at the two government-sponsored enterprises and on Wall Street." ---------------------------------------------- Friday, October 3, 2008 9:09 AM From: Xxxx Xxxxx To: [email group] On its merits, the Bail-Out plan is a bad bill, no question. Some government action is surely called for, but this is wrong-headed and still basically a give-away to rich speculators. That said, the House progressive caucus split on the vote and had previously sent a letter to Pelosi, with Schakowsky signing on, calling for the bail-out to be paid for by the speculators that caused the mess, as well as measures to help foreclosures and a rescue of 'Main Street'. Those positives were not in the House bill, nor the Senate version expected to pass the House today, due to strong-arm and scare tactics. So ... Wall Street will get its bail-out, as expected. That will not stem the tide of foreclosures or lay-offs or the health care crisis or the many other "main street" needs that were apparently 'too small' to fix. It's time for a series of peoples assemblies to develop what a "Peoples Bail-Out" would look like. We can insist that such a package be brought up in the lame duck session, after Nov. 4, or in the first 100 days of the Obama administration ---------------------------------------------- BENCH NOTE: What we really need is the FBI to arrest half of the members of Congress. A pox on them all. ---------------------------------------------- RELATED: Franklin Raines, Jamie Gorelick, Penny Pritzker, Jim Johnson & Obama Fannie Mae and the Vast Bipartisan Conspiracy 'Crony' Capitalism Is Root Cause Of Fannie And Freddie Troubles Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac execs now offering advice to Obama The Affirmative Action Economic Meltdown Barack Obama's Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Connection To: Jan and Andy - Re: Joe Moore