Update, July 27: China takes over closed U.S. Consulate in Chengdu days after ordering it shut, as relations continue to plummet - CBS News. "China maintains consulates in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago and New York along with its embassy in Washington. The U.S. has four other consulates in China and an embassy in Beijing, keeping the sides in parity in terms of diplomatic missions."
Showing posts with label diplomacy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label diplomacy. Show all posts
Three Videos Explain US and China Consulate Closings (Updated)
Update, July 27: China takes over closed U.S. Consulate in Chengdu days after ordering it shut, as relations continue to plummet - CBS News. "China maintains consulates in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago and New York along with its embassy in Washington. The U.S. has four other consulates in China and an embassy in Beijing, keeping the sides in parity in terms of diplomatic missions."
WHY They Burned Documents: U.S. Shuts Down Chinese Consulate in Houston, Charges of Spying and Theft of Scientific Research
Last night we posted that smoke was seen coming from the Consulate General of China in Houston. Local police and firefighters were standing by outside the building at 3417 Montrose Boulevard. Video showed people in the consulate's courtyard burning documents.
The reason: Yesterday, the U.S. ordered China to close the consulate before the end of Friday, July 24. Though not happy about it, China is indeed shutting it down — at least for now.
Today on Google Maps the consulate, also called the "Passport and Visa Office of China Consulate General in Houston," is listed as "temporarily closed."
The reason: Yesterday, the U.S. ordered China to close the consulate before the end of Friday, July 24. Though not happy about it, China is indeed shutting it down — at least for now.
#China’s consulate in #Houston is not a diplomatic facility. It is the central node of the Communist Party’s vast network of spies & influence operations in the United States. Now that building must close & the spies have 72 hours to leave or face arrest.— Marco Rubio (@marcorubio) July 22, 2020
This needed to happen.
Consulate General of China in Houston Is Burning Documents In Their Courtyard; Houston Police and Fire On Scene
Video shows people who appear to be deliberately burning documents in the inner, open-air courtyard of the Consulate General of China in Houston. (See update here.)
"Houston police tell FOX 26 that they were burning classified documents because they are being evicted from the building on Friday at 4 p.m. When asked why the Chinese Consulate was being evicted, HPD told us to ask the U.S. State Department or President Donald Trump himself."
According to KPRC, "Houston police and fire officials are responding to reports that documents are being burned in the courtyard of the Consulate General of China in Houston, according to the Houston Police Department.This video shared with us by a viewer who lives next to the Consulate General of China in #Houston shows fire and activity in the courtyard of the building.— KPRC2Tulsi (@KPRC2Tulsi) July 22, 2020
DETAILS SO FAR: https://t.co/2cOeKoap96 pic.twitter.com/0myxe6HIlC
The Special Video Trump Showed Kim Jong Un: "A Story Of Opportunity"
![]() |
Trump and Kim shake hands in Singapore |
Cleverly presented as if it was a movie trailer, the video speaks directly to Kim about becoming a historic agent of change for good. It is clever for a couple of reasons. First, it's a faux trailer for a non-existent movie. Kim isn't stupid, he undoubtedly got that. Second, a trailer is for a movie that is yet to be seen, and the smart metaphor presented by this video "trailer" is that Kim has an opportunity to help make that exciting film.
Video: Benghazi Hearing Witness Answers Hillary Clinton's Question, "What Difference Does It Make?"
May 8, 2013 - The first day of the House committee hearings on Benghazi produced a lot of fascinating testimony today, much of it damaging to the Obama Administration and to former Sec. of State Hillary Clinton. While questioning whistle blower Gregory Hicks, Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Arizona) played a video clip of Clinton's testimony to the Senate in December. (Video below.)
In that clip, Clinton said, "The fact is, we have four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest, or was it because of guys out for a walk one night and decided they'd go kill some Americans? What difference, at this point, does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again." Gosar then asked Hicks for his reaction to Clinton's question, "What difference does it make?." (Continued below video.)
Hicks said, "I think the question is 'What difference did it make?'" Hicks recalled that Libyan President Mohamed Yousef El-Magariaf, who immediately said that the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi was a terrorist operation, "was insulted in front of his own people, in front of the world, his credibility was reduced, his ability to lead his own country was damaged, he was angry."
Magariaf's anger was also due largely to Susan Rice's talk show appearances in which she parroted the Administration's false assertion that the attack was the result of a spontaneous reaction to a video that insulted the prophet Mohammed. On Sept. 16, 2012, while Rice was out perpetuating the lie about the cause of the attack, Magariaf was telling the talk shows a very different story.
"The way these perpetrators acted and moved -- I think we, and they're choosing the specific date for this so-called demonstration, I think we have no, this leaves us with no doubt that this was pre-planned, determined," Magariaf said on CBS's "Face the Nation."
"A friend of mine who ate dinner with him in New York during the U.N. season," Hicks continued, "told me that [Magriaf] was still steamed about the talk shows two weeks later. And I definitely believe that it negatively affected our ability to get the FBI team quickly to Benghazi."
So, back to Clinton's question "What difference does it make?" As Hicks pointed out, it badly affected diplomatic relations with Libya's new president Magariaf, who publicly said the attack was terrorism but was contradicted publicly and repeatedly by the Obama Administration. That caused tensions that slowed the FBI's ability to investigate the crime scene in Benghazi. It unfairly compromised Magariaf's own credibility on the world stage.
Clinton also said, "It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again." Yes, indeed, and that's what the House hearings on Benghazi are about. Perhaps future leaders can learn from these hearing that politics should never be placed ahead of American lives, that the safety and security of Americans abroad is more important than any budgetary concerns, and that lying about criminal and willful negligence will not go unnoticed or unpunished.
Rep. Gosar tweeted this after the hearings:
Rep. Paul Gosar, DDS @RepGosar 49m
Today’s hearing demands further investigation; as new info
shattered Obama Administration lies surrounding #Benghazi.
In that clip, Clinton said, "The fact is, we have four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest, or was it because of guys out for a walk one night and decided they'd go kill some Americans? What difference, at this point, does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again." Gosar then asked Hicks for his reaction to Clinton's question, "What difference does it make?." (Continued below video.)
Hicks said, "I think the question is 'What difference did it make?'" Hicks recalled that Libyan President Mohamed Yousef El-Magariaf, who immediately said that the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi was a terrorist operation, "was insulted in front of his own people, in front of the world, his credibility was reduced, his ability to lead his own country was damaged, he was angry."
![]() |
Gregory Hicks at Benghazi hearings. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images via NY Daily News |
"The way these perpetrators acted and moved -- I think we, and they're choosing the specific date for this so-called demonstration, I think we have no, this leaves us with no doubt that this was pre-planned, determined," Magariaf said on CBS's "Face the Nation."
"A friend of mine who ate dinner with him in New York during the U.N. season," Hicks continued, "told me that [Magriaf] was still steamed about the talk shows two weeks later. And I definitely believe that it negatively affected our ability to get the FBI team quickly to Benghazi."
So, back to Clinton's question "What difference does it make?" As Hicks pointed out, it badly affected diplomatic relations with Libya's new president Magariaf, who publicly said the attack was terrorism but was contradicted publicly and repeatedly by the Obama Administration. That caused tensions that slowed the FBI's ability to investigate the crime scene in Benghazi. It unfairly compromised Magariaf's own credibility on the world stage.
Clinton also said, "It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again." Yes, indeed, and that's what the House hearings on Benghazi are about. Perhaps future leaders can learn from these hearing that politics should never be placed ahead of American lives, that the safety and security of Americans abroad is more important than any budgetary concerns, and that lying about criminal and willful negligence will not go unnoticed or unpunished.
Rep. Gosar tweeted this after the hearings:
Rep. Paul Gosar, DDS @RepGosar 49m
Today’s hearing demands further investigation; as new info
shattered Obama Administration lies surrounding #Benghazi.
Could China-Japan Dispute Over Tiny Islands Cause World War Three?
![]() |
Chinese pilots and Jian-10 fighters (photo: Xinhua) |
The China-Japan dispute over three seemingly unimportant islands is not getting the attention it deserves. Professor Hugh White of National University in Australia, a defense expert, has made news this week by writing that the disagreement over the islands could cause Japan and China to stumble into full-blown shooting war with each other. He says the United States, and possibly other nations, would probably get sucked into the fight. (More about Prof. White below.)
![]() |
Japan says "Senkaku" but China says "Diaoyu." Both nations say "hands off." |
The disputed islands are called "Senkaku" by Japan and "Diaoyu" by China. The islands are in the East China Sea (see map), and are also claimed by Taiwan. They are tiny, but are on a strategically important shipping route. In addition, however, the tiny islands sit atop large deposits of hydrocarbon petroleum and natural gas, discovered in the 1970s. Not surprisingly, that's when China and Taiwan began claiming the little islands.
Japan has long claimed that it has controlled the islands from 1895 until surrendered to the U.S. in 1945, at the end of World War II. The U.S. controlled the islands until 1972, when it returned them to Japan’s control. China, however, claims to have discovered the islands in the 14th century and to have controlled them since then.
Today, China is accusing Japan of deliberately trying to escalate the already tense situation:
A Chinese government spokesman Thursday [Dec. 27] said a maritime surveillance plane was harassed by Japanese military aircraft while patrolling the airspace near the disputed Diaoyu islands," reports TwoCircles.com. "Shi Qingfeng, spokesman for the State Oceanic Administration, said Japan's action was meant to escalate the situation and it should bear the consequences, Xinhua reported. Shi said the Chinese plane was conducting a routine patrol in the airspace over the East China Sea about 150 km from the Diaoyu islands. He said the flight route used by the Chinese plane has been used by Chinese surveillance aircraft since 2007. "The Japanese side's disturbance was intended to cause confusion and distort the truth," he said.
![]() |
Harbin Y-12, Chinese surveillance aircraft |
Earlier this week, says International Business Times (IBT), "Japanese and Chinese military made contact near the disputed islands. The Y-12, a Chinese maritime surveillance aircraft that was cruising around the disputed territories, was intercepted by several Japanese Air Self-Defense forces."
"Up to eight F-15 jets were scramble by the JASDF (Japan Air Self Defense Force) in the morning of Dec. 13 (02.00 GMT – 11.00 LT)," reported The Aviationist, "after a Chinese Harbin Y-12 maritime surveillance aircraft skirted one of the disputed islands in the East China Sea." Japan said China was violating its airspace. China, however, considers that to be their own airspace.
PROF. HUGH WHITE, "THIS IS HOW WARS USUALLY START"
Prof. Hugh White (see bio) |
The U.S. could become embroiled in a China-Japan war because of "America's recent pivot to Asia, which has sought to increase its military presence in various parts of Asia, posing a threat to China," says IBT. "In return, China has pushed back against U.S. pressure. China's formidable military developments, including a new fighter jet and aircraft carrier, has both Japan and the U.S. anxious."
Prof. White, says The Japan Daily Press, "feels that China is attempting to challenge the U.S. and President Barack Obama’s 'pivot to Asia,' itself a response to China’s growing power and territorial claims in the region. He believes that the tit-for-tat dispute over the uninhabited islands in the East China Sea is what inevitably leads to someone opening fire."
THE OBAMA "PIVOT"
By "Obama's pivot," Prof. White was referring to the Obama administration’s strategic “pivot” from the Middle East to East Asia.
Prof. White wrote that warning in a column that was published by The Sydney Morning Herald on Dec. 26. It's ominous title was "Caught in a bind that threatens an Asian war nobody wants." The column start with, "THIS is how wars usually start: with a steadily escalating stand-off over something intrinsically worthless. So don't be too surprised if the US and Japan go to war with China next year over the uninhabited rocks that Japan calls the Senkakus and China calls the Diaoyu islands. And don't assume the war would be contained and short."
The vision of a China-Japan shooting war is not some lone, crazy vision held only by Prof. White. Many are worried about it, actually, as indicated by a Dec. 17 article at CurrentIntelligence.net (with my emphasis added):
As tensions persist between China and Japan over the disputed islands in the East China Sea, the United States faces the almost impossible task of simultaneously reassuring and constraining its regional allies, while ensuring that it does not escalate its own tensions with Beijing. On one level it is hard to see how China and Japan could become so consumed over a small set of remote islands and it remains unclear how serious the crisis is. Yet, over the past several months, Chinese and Japanese ships have been patrolling the same waters with both laying territorial claims to the area. And, earlier this fall, U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta warned that the escalating tensions and close proximity of Chinese and Japanese vessels could lead to some triggering event and conflict.Video Below: Professor Hugh White's speech entitled 'Abandon the Alliance? How China's rise will shape Australia's future'." Related articles listed below.
Related:
- Japan scrambles fighters for China plane (Dec. 13, 2012) Inquirer News
- China 1950 paper says Senkakus are Japan's Japan Times
- China Says Geology Boosts Island Claims Voice of America
- Time to teach those around South China Sea a lesson Global Times (China govt owned)
- Nuclear sparks could fly in Asia-Pacific United States Studies Centre, Univ. of Sydney
- The Obama Administration's Pivot To Asia Foreign Policy
- Obama's Asia "pivot" advances, but obstacles await Reuters
- The Problem With The Pivot Foreign Affairs
- Should Australia form an alliance with Japan? Prof. Hugh White lecture, YouTube
- ICG Says South China Sea Primed for Armed Conflict New Pacific Institute
- U.S. To Deploy Latest Battlecraft To Its Asia-Pacific Bases TodayOnline.com
- 2012: The Year of Chinese Air Power? Asia Security Watch
Putin Asks "Why Was Assange Hidden In Jail?"
It's not like me to agree with Vladimir Putin, nor am I a fan of Julian Assange of Wikileaks. But even Putin can ask a reasonable set of questions now and then, which he did this week.
MOSCOW - Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin on Thursday led growing support from some world leaders for the beleaguered WikiLeaks founder, describing his detention in Britain as 'undemocratic'.
Mr Putin railed against the detention of the 39-year-old Julian Assange, the Australian founder of the website which has been releasing thousands of secret US diplomatic cables as well as Pentagon communiques.
'Why was Mr Assange hidden in jail? Is that democracy? As we say in the village: the pot is calling the kettle black,' Mr Putin said. 'I want to send the ball back to our American colleagues,' Mr Putin added. Full article at The Straits Times...
As for "calling the kettle black," perhaps the black kettle is calling the black kettle black. I know, that's a bit confusing. But then, so is Russian politics. Putin may have a point on the Assange issue, but he's no friend of democracy himself. Just ask Mikhail Gorbachev, who has noted the fragile nature of Russia's political tundra previously, but issued a more ominous advisory this week.
"Former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev has warned that Russia's undemocratic political landscape is threatening its stability," reports The Associated Press. "Gorbachev said in an article published Friday in Novaya Gazeta newspaper that the lack of political competition, flawed elections, shrinking media freedom and rampant corruption have slowed down Russia's development."
AP quotes Gorbachev as saying, "If we fail to overcome undemocratic trends, all our achievements of the previous years will come under threat."
RELATED:
Putin Slams West for Wikileaks' Assange Arrest ABC World News
Gorbachev on WikiLeaks: Fire Diplomats NewsMax.com
Alex Jones on Coast to Coast Radio: Assange is just a scapegoat Examiner.com
Wikileaks Founder: Bigger Bombshells On The Way PrisonPlanet.com

Ho Chunk Nation Visits Uptown, Chicago
Spotted this car from the Ho Chunk Nation (in Wisconsin) as I was about to board a train at the Wilson CTA station in Uptown recently. I don't know what it was doing there and did not see the person driving it.
I assume the car was only being used for official use, but what official use would there be here? (I dunno, I'm just asking.)
Question: If an official car from the Ho Chunk Nation gets a parking ticket, would it be dismissed for diplomatic immunity?
UPDATED: PAKISTAN BRACING FOR WAR: INDIAN MILITARY ASKS FOR AIRSTRIKES
India Loves George W. Bush
UPDATE: RICE SAYS PAKISTAN MUST COOPERATE
PUTIN, RUSSIA ACCUSE U.S. "SPY"
MUST READ: WORLD WAR THREE
Some say it's inevitable. Some say it's about to begin. One, Nikolai Sokov, postulates in the Asia Times how WWIII will begin, why and where. Remember how WWI began? Sokov briefs us on that nicely, then runs headlong into this:
Now imagine the repetition of exactly the same scenario a year from now. With troops in Georgia, the US government will not be able to stay away or back down. Whatever actually provokes hostilities, the US's pro-Georgian and anti-Russian version will prevail. This means America will be at war.
The Russians cannot back down either, and their pretext will be the exact opposite of Tbilisi's and Washington's. They will be at war as well.
Scary reading, but important and essential. See the FULL ARTICLE at Asia Times...
RELATED:
Russia cruiser to test weapons in crowded Black Sea
Russian war emboldens Georgia's other separatists
West Struggles for Solutions as Caucasus Crisis Simmers
Pentagon says Russia not honoring Georgia deal
Russia mocks West's displeasure over war in Georgia
Russia as Teacher
Russia, says Alexandros Petersen in the EUObserver today, has taught the West three valuable lessons. Or, at least Petersen says, there are lessons to be learned.
However:
The West should resist Russia's lesson plan with a multi-pronged strategy of its own. George Bush, Gordon Brown Angela Merkel and Nicolas Sarkozy should show solidarity with democratic Georgia by travelling to its capital, Tbilisi, on a very public visit. FULL ARTICLE at EUObserver.com...
UKRAINE TO RUSSIA: SCREW YOU
Welcome to Part II of the Cold War. Gen X and Gen Y kidz can now experience for themselves the tensions and fears of what Boomers and the Greatest Generation went through for decades: Nations begging the United States for help in defending their freedom against the Russians. (Yes, the U.S., the country that Liberals love to portray as being hated by everyone in the world, is the country that nations in trouble still turn to for hope and help.)
Take this for example: After the recent Rape of Georgia by Vladimir Putin's stormtroopers, the nations of Eastern Europe are nervous that they will be next.
Ukraine, in a major move both diplomatically and militarily, has taken a precautionary move by offering the use of a Soviet-built air base to the United States, and by upping their defensive weapons purchasing from us.
Ukraine said it was ready to give both Europe and America access to its missile warning systems after Russia earlier annulled a 1992 cooperation agreement involving two satellite tracking stations. Previously, the stations were part of Russia's early-warning system for missiles coming from Europe. [Source: Telegraph UK]
Remember that countries such as Poland, Romania, Latvia, and Georgia were once captive nations, part of the old Soviet Union (USSR) not by choice but by the force of Russian might.
The Russian army continues to rape and pillage inside of Georgian territory, despite the recent Neville Chamberlain-style "cease fire" brokered by French President Sarkozy, Ukraine looks to the United States for defensive weapons and reassurance. (The BBC, an admittedly Leftist "news" organization with old pro-Soviet leanings, lavished praise on Sarkozy's efforts even as they were failing - and even as the BBC knew they were failing.)
The difference between the Sarkozy ceasefire and the Chamberlain deal with Hitler is that, at least, Chamberlain negotiated with Hitler in a vain attempt to prevent an invasion. Sarkozy got involved after Russia was already well behind Georgian lines.
We've seen this kind of invasion before: Russia's August 1968 Invasion of Czechoslovakia; Germany's invasion of the Sudetenland (part of the former Czechoslovakia) in October, 1938. Perhaps we have learned from it, perhaps not. Sarkozy, heart in the right place, seems not to have gotten the lesson. Barack Obama immediately urged both Russia and Georgia to "show restraint," a la Chamberlain, in a way that only a self-centered man with no understanding of current world politics or 20th Century history could.
Georgia did not attack Russia in 2008. Czechoslovakia did not attack Russia in 1968, nor Germany in 1938. Those invasions were completely unprovoked attacks, invasions motivated solely by territorial gain for strategic purposes.
Rory Leishman writes today in the London Free Press (Canada) that we must not forget history:
Today, unlike 70 years ago, the leaders of most of the Western democracies seem resolved not to be weighed in the balance and found wanting in their determination to resist the aggression of a dictatorial thug. FULL COLUMN...
Make no mistake: The old USSR/Soviet Union is trying to resurrect itself in Europe. That scares the hell out of Europeans, and rightly so. It should scare the rest of the world, too.
RELATED:
Bad New Bear
Why Is Moscow Risking a New Cold War?
Russia calls for new security order in Europe
”USA lagging behind in race for the Arctic“
Treating War as Political Farce
Georgian powder keg evokes plight of Czechoslovakia
October 15, 1938 - Germans Troops Occupy Sudetenland
Bill Clinton As Ambassador to the World?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)