Showing posts with label babies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label babies. Show all posts

Mof Gimmers, Anti-Human Snob Who Hates Unborn Babies

3D-Babies.com
January 22, 2014 - Expecting parents can now get a life-size 3D model made of their unborn child. A new company, 3-D Babies, uses 3D/4D ultrasound images "to create a unique artistic representation of your baby using the latest computer graphics and 3D printing technology."

As "art" the fetus models are a bit tacky, in a big-eyed-children-on-black-velvet paintings way. That's just my opinion, though, and if parents want a model of their unborn child it's alright by me. There's no harm in it. Love it or hate it, you have to admit that it's an innovative way to make use of 3D printer technology.

British writer Mof Gimmers is very afraid, however. He confesses to being horrified by the 3D baby models and of the soon-to-be-born human beings that they represent. "Unborn babies and fish alike," he wrote, "are about as sentient as a Furby in a skip of emulsion." Nice, huh? No wonder Gimmers was named as one of the "100 worst people on Twitter."

"EVER looked at the world and become suddenly depressed?" wrote Gimmers in a January 21 post at Anorak with the melodramatic headline "Horrifying figurines of foetuses, now available to buy."

3D model of unborn baby by 3D-Babies
3D-Babies.com
Gimmers is revolted by unborn human beings, and that actually seems to be the root of his vile post: It's not the models that bothers him, really, its what they represent to him. He's one of those monstrous people who call the unborn "little parasites," and I'm sure he would agree that a fetus is nothing more than a "clump of cells" less deserving of respect than a spoonful of chicken broth. Fetuses are like fish, he says. I'm not sure how he sees a fish when he looks at the 3D fetus models, but his hatred and disdain of unborn children are obvious.

When Gimmers sees a fetus model, he sees viciousness, cruelty and bloodiness. Perhaps that's a Freudian expression of his guilt feelings about abortion, which he obviously supports.

In Gimmers' twisted worldview, a mother's unborn child is just a parasite sitting in a sack of its own feces, not worthy of being born - especially if its parents had a 3D model made of it. (Note: Fetuses do not defecate in the womb; there's no need. The mother digests food, not the fetus; nutrients are passed to the fetus via blood through the umbilical chord.)

Gimmers is too cowardly to use his real name. He calls himself an "anti-snob" on his Tumblr blog (which takes forever to load). However, Gimmers is a snob. "Anyone buying these," he wrote, "should have spent that money on condoms or the taxi fare to a vasectomy." Agree with me, he seems to say, or submit to sterilization.

In other words, Gimmers is saying that the child should not have been conceived because Gimmers' artistic taste differs from that of the parents. Gimmers is unable to recognize that calling happy, expecting parents who are eager to "see" their unborn child "gruesome womb-botherers" is the height of snobbery. Indeed, his entire article is an elitist, snobbish demand that people who have different tastes in art be disallowed from reproducing. Pray that Gimmers never becomes Minister of Eugenics.

Gimmers and creeps like him must recoil in fear and disgust when they see a pregnant woman. A psychologically healthy person would see the beauty of a mother-to-be. Not Gimmers' crowd. They see a woman victimized by an ugly fish-like parasite lurking inside of her body. What must they think of a newborn child, freshly out of the womb, crapping all over itself and still dependent on its parents for food and safety?

Also See: 

Born Under Obama

Here's a frightening thought: Hundreds of thousands of Americans have been born and will be born under the jackboot of the Obama Regime. (Don't even get me started on how many have been aborted; that's another post for another time.) Cartoonist Chris Muir has a running cartoon strip called Day By Day that deals with all things political from a conservative viewpoint. Currently, the strip is looking at parents having babies while Barack Obama is busy screwing up their future. A panel of Day By Day is shown here (click to enlarge). In an entertaining comic strip format, Muir gets his anti-socialist message across in wry fashion. Muir's strip deals with all things political, not just babies. Check out the brilliant Day By Day web site to follow this great ongoing cartoon soap opera. Leave a Comment Conservative T-Shirts Follow CNB on Twitter RSS Feed

Girl Tried to Kill Newborn (Obama Might Approve)

A 15-year old girl has been charged with attempted first-degree murder and aggravated battery in the case of an abandoned baby two months ago in Chicago's Uptown neighborhood. Barack Obama might approve of her actions. Obama might even support the girl's actions. ("Whoa, Tom!," you may be screaming, "How can you say such a horrible thing?!?" Keep reading, you'll see...) Lorraine Swanson has the story in a web-extra at News-Star: On Sunday, the teenager turned herself in to Area 3 detectives at Belmont and Western, where she was charged with one count each of attempted first-degree murder and aggravated battery. [Source] NOTE: We should probably go easy on the girl. After all, she was thoughtful enough to wrap the newborn in plastic bags. Barack Obama might approve of that. After all, Obama voted more than once to allow the killing of fully born, viable babies. Don't believe me? Read on.... Obama’s legislative actions in 2003 - denying effective protection even to babies born alive during abortions - were contrary to the position taken on the same language by even the most liberal members of Congress. The bill Obama killed was virtually identical to the federal bill that even NARAL ultimately did not oppose. [Source] Obama would probably feel that the 15-year old shouldn't be "punished with a baby." No, in Obama's universe, it's better to punish the baby, even that means killing it. From the Chicago Tribune, August 26, 2008: The debate over Obama's voting record has grown so arcane that we've lost sight of why this question ever came up: Some infants that survive abortion are denied medical assistance. They are left to die.... Some actually are born healthy because they are aborted to preserve the "health" of the mother, or because the pregnancy was due to rape or incest. At best, they are left in a "comfort room," complete with a camera (for pictures of the aborted baby) "baptismal supplies, gowns, and certificates, footprinting equipment and baby bracelets for mementos and a rocking chair," where they are rocked to death. "Before the comfort room was established," Stanek said, "babies were taken to the soiled utility room to die." [Source] Now, tell me, what's the difference between what the 15-year old girl did and what goes on every day in "comfort rooms?" RELATED: Obama's Abortion Distortion - Weekly Standard - Aug 13, 2008 - The senator's excuses for opposing the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act don't withstand scrutiny. Explosive Audio of Obama Dismissing Abortion Bill - Fox News - Aug 22, 2008 - Interview: Explosive Audio of Obama Dismissing Abortion Bill, Explosive audio surfaces of Obama dismissing abortion survival bill. A stark choice on abortion - The Boston Globe - Sep 3, 2008 - Obama advocates abortion rights even more sweeping than those enacted under Roe v. Wade. RealClearPolitics - Articles - Obama's Abortion Extremism Obama changes abortion story, again

Tiny Babies


Billboard at N. Clark and W. Morse in Rogers Park, Chicago.

American Holocaust Slows Down

The good news: The U.S. abortion rate has fallen from 1.6 million in 1990. The bad news: More than a million more babies will be ripped out of their mothers' wombs in 2008. U.S. Abortions at Lowest Rate Since 1974 January 9, 2008 The number of abortions in the United States fell to 1.2 million in down 25 percent from the all-time high of 1.6 million in 1990 and dropping the abortion rate - MORE at BREITBART...