Preface: The ACLU fights hard to protect my right to say or write this kind of stuff. So before you write in to say "shame on you," let me be proactive: You'd be a hypocrite. We don't like hypocrites, do we?
Last night I saw a hip-hop act at a local club, which I won't name because I (still) like the club. I didn't like what I heard, however.
I was getting into the show, enjoying the act when suddenly the two performers felt compelled to scream "Fuck Bush!" into their microphones. It had nothing to do with their act, as far as I could tell. It couldn't have been electioneering, that ended two months ago.
It was hate speech. Unexpected, irrelevant and unadulterated.
When was the last time you were at a live show and the performers shouted "Fuck Pelosi!" or "Fuck John Kerry!"?
But would I advocate banning such speech? Hell no. But there are plenty of Democrats - and related Liberals - who would quickly limit what you can say. They're already working on it. More on that further down.
Senator Robert "KKK" Byrd (D-W.VA) is a revered and long-time Democrat in the US Senate. He's also a former grand wizard of the Ku Klux Klan.

He has referred to some people as "white niggers."
He regularly references (
gasp!) God and Jesus and "the Lord" while doing official business, often on the floor of the Senate.
If this vile creep was a Republican, most of the media would condemn him. But as a Democrat, he is mostly ignored. Democrats, you see, get a free pass when they use hate speech, refer to God, use the word "nigger" or head up a regional chapter of the KKK.
Take this, for example (
found here):
This from the Washington Post's account of the opening of the new Congress (or was it senate?)The attention quickly shifted -- to Robert Byrd. The 89-year-old West Virginia Democrat, beginning his ninth term, wore a red-white-and-blue tie and punctuated the opening prayer with shouts of "Yes!" and "Mmmhmmm!" and "Yes, Lord!" and "Yes, in Jesus's name!" When he was sworn in, he twice cried out "Hallelujah!" and then "Amen!" Minutes later, he was installed as Senate president pro tempore, the majority party's most senior member. "Yeah, man! Yeah, man!" he shouted. "Hallelujah!" "I do, so help me God!" he shouted when the oath was administered. "Yeah, man!"Comments from Power Line: "Byrd's Democratic colleagues seemed more amused than upset by the old fool's "Christianist" display. Senator Kennedy pretended to tilt a bottle into his mouth. Either he was suggesting that Byrd was under the influence or Kennedy himself was ready for a drink."

Or if you head up a hugely popular blogweb called the "Daily Kos." Kos is a blatant racist and regularly hosts postings that use the N word and anti-semitic content. Again, the mainstream media give Kos a pass. Why? Because Daily Kos is anti-Republican, that's why.
Hate speech comes in many flavors. The Democrats don't like any of them, unless
they're the ones serving up a cold bowl of hate.
The slanderous poster of Sec. of State Condoleeza Rice (left) is taken from Daily Kos.
Recently, when President Gerald Ford died, I was at the Red Line Tap. Several non-Republican types immediately laughed and cheered at the news. One said, "Tomorrow it's George Bush." Nice. Such Democrat Love Speech is just overwhelming.
For more Love there's "Three Minutes of Democrat Hate Speech," (found here). The audio is chilling, straight out of Orwell's 1984. Again, the speakers are not Republicans.
Democrats are slowly but very surely moving to ban certain types of speech that they find offensive. "Politically correct" speech has become a joke, but it's easy to joke about speech that has not been officially banned. What I'm talking about here is speech that Democrat legislators at every level want to ban. They want to muzzle you. (And you thought George Bush was taking away your rights?) "The End Of Free Speech In America?" is a fine posting that you should take a look at - before it's banned.
Or removed from the internet, as has been threatened.
An old tactic of Democrats is to accuse people of racism or bigotry if they dare to question one of their own, no matter how legitimate the question may be. Dems love to mock George W. Bush for his Christian beliefs. Yet a Muslim Congressman can tell an audience that in regards to future legislative decisions, "I'm not here to be a preacher, but in terms of political agenda items, my faith informs these things."
Huh? What would the reaction be if any Republican said "my faith informs these things?" The reaction would include - although not be limited to - plenty of hateful invenctive.
We are seeing this played out now in the case of newly elected Congressman Keith Ellison, a Muslim. From World Net Daily, the following:
"When the first Muslim congressman in U.S. history, Keith Ellison (Hakim-Mohammed) of Minnesota, won the 2006 election and was making the regular thank-you-to-my-supporters speech, he allowed his fans to shout, "Allahu Akbar!," the same phrase allegedly used by the 9/11 suicide pilots.
Since November he's addressed various different Islamic groups and organizations, and he's used the Quran to be sworn into office. He's also been linked to Islamic organizations with questionable agendas." Full story...
More reasonable questions in "Keith Ellison's Friends, Our Enemies" found here.
Let us not forget Iran's recent Orgy of Holocaust Denial, either. Read this brief and insightful report from Daniel Schorr. Boy, talk about a big hate fest, but did you hear Democrats decrying this? No, they chose for the most part to overlook it, or rather, look away and pretend it wasn't there. Why? Because the Iranians are not Republicans, you see, and better yet the Iranians present a problem for a Republican president currently in office.